When we think about cyber attacks or data breaches, one of the first things that come to our mind is information being stolen from people in the C-suite. But, how can a CEO or a chief financial officer be held responsible if they’re not even aware of what’s going on? It’s simple, c-suites should not have access to confidential company data because it can lead to disastrous outcomes.

Given this increased vulnerability faced by c-suites across the globe, zero-trust came into existence. Zero trust is a security model that assists in countering successful data infringements by eliminating the concept of security from a company’s network architecture.

Understanding Zero Trust Security

Zero trust refers to an IT network security standard demanding identity verification for every device or individual trying to place an access request on an interface. It applies to every individual or device asking for access within or outside the interface.

In addition, zero trust is a holistic program where only allowed devices and people can access applications and data to guard the application against cybercriminals and online fraudsters. Also, as compared to the fundamental safety model, robust identification of user machines, controlled access to information, reliable data transfer, and storage are some of the principal benefits of zero-trust security.

The fundamental principle behind zero-trust security is that cybercriminals or hackers can be within the interface or outside the network. Therefore, companies cannot blindly trust any machine or user. Moreover, another crucial feature of the protocol is the least-privilege access.

It implies that people will receive only the access they need or as much as they should know. Hence, not all people who send access requests can access the confidential parts of the application. In other terms, the sensitive data remains secure.

However, to make sound choices in a zero-trust security model, IT teams must hold a better user understanding and the way they operate. Additionally, a standing privilege no longer applies with Zero Trust, defining the extent of the harm if data hack or malware enters the system. Apart from this, zero trust can help organizations with the following:

  • Zero trust guards remote employees more efficiently than conventional methods, and the benefits move beyond security to enhance productivity and business agility.
  • One of the most vital perspectives of zero trust is its least privilege access feature, which reduces users’ extreme trust within a standard interface.

What are the Repercussions of a C-Suite’s Account Breach?

Companies give data access to their top executives for a variety of reasons, but are these decisions always the best ones? While business leaders have a lot of valuable insights into how the company should handle information, when access is given out to far too many people, repercussions are deemed to arise. Some of the top ones are as follows:

  • Operational disruptions

From the time your organizational data gets compromised to the research and recovery method, the consequences of a data infringement significantly affect business operations. Also, depending on the breach severity, data violations can result in a comprehensive data loss, demanding victims to spend a long recovery time.

In addition, the most typical course of action in these situations is to close operations until you find a solution, providing enough time to concentrate on finding the source of the c-suite breach.

  • Financial loss

The financial repercussions of a c-suit’s account breach are unquestionably one of the most critical and hard-hitting impacts that companies will have to dispense with.

Expenses can include compensating concerned clients, setting up incident response efforts, investing in new safety measures, investigating the breach, statutory charges, and not to mention the exorbitant regulatory fines inflicted for non-compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

  • Sensitive data loss

If a c-suite’s account breach occurs in a confidential data loss, the results are disastrous. Private data is any data used indirectly or directly to identify a person. Also, it will cover everything from a name to IP address, email address, and images. It further involves confidential data, such as biometric or genetic data, processed to distinguish a person.

Understanding Security Benefits of Zero Trust

Modern cloud platforms can be a hostile place, and granting overall access to your c-suite can be risky. Therefore, it becomes crucial for contemporary businesses to adopt a zero-trust security model that helps companies extend relevant access to relevant people. Mentioned hereunder are some of the top security benefits of zero trust.

  • Zero trust security helps your IT team to operate more efficiently. Also, it uses centralized monitoring and is effortless to store data in a single location.
  • Zero trust facilitates sophisticated analytics, enabling your team to gain insights they would not own otherwise. Consequently, your IT team will be able to maintain a more guarded atmosphere with fewer employees.
  • Zero trust presents exceptional data safety. A Zero Standing Privilege architecture paired with real-time access limits rogue employees or malware from accessing substantial sections of your interface.
  • Zero trust security model gets developed on analytics and constant monitoring, and you can employ automation to examine access requests.

The Bottom Line

The majority of organizations don’t have a chief data officer. As a result, they have no specific individual who is solely responsible for protecting their company’s data (and privacy) from malicious attacks or large-scale leaks. But are C-Suite executives even the best candidates for this position? It’s time to give this a thought.

Read More: