US
US

India Creates Distinct Digital Gaming Category in 2025 Income Tax Bill

In a landmark development for India’s booming digital entertainment sector, the Income Tax Bill 2025 has established a separate category for online gaming, distinguishing it from traditional gambling and lotteries for taxation purposes.

This legislative shift acknowledges the growing economic importance of India’s digital gaming industry, currently valued at approximately USD 3.1 billion. It implements a more nuanced taxation framework designed specifically for online gaming activities.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Income Tax Bill 2025 establishes “online gaming” as a distinct tax category, separating it from gambling and lotteries
  • The bill introduces the concept of “net winnings” for taxation, allowing deduction of entry fees before calculating tax liability
  • India’s digital gaming industry is projected to grow from $2.6 billion in FY22 to $8.6 billion by FY27
  • The 30% tax rate remains unchanged, but applies only to net winnings exceeding ₹10,000 in a single transaction
  • Gaming platforms are responsible for TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) implementation rather than individual players
  • Players cannot offset gaming losses against other income sources or carry them forward to subsequent years
  • Despite these improvements, India’s GST rate of 28% on gaming deposits remains higher than global standards

A New Era of Gaming Classification

The Income Tax Bill 2025, introduced in Parliament on February 13, 2025, creates unprecedented clarity by providing a specific definition for ‘online game’ that distinguishes it from other forms of gambling.

According to the bill, an online game is defined as “a game that is offered on the internet and is accessible by a user through a computer resource including any telecommunication device.” This comprehensive definition encompasses games played on computers, mobile phones, tablets, and other telecommunication devices.

This represents a major departure from the Income Tax Act of 1961, which grouped online gaming with lotteries and gambling, creating significant ambiguity in taxation procedures. The new legislation acknowledges the unique nature of digital gaming and establishes a distinct taxation category that reflects its growing prominence in India’s digital economy.

“This is a watershed moment for India’s gaming industry,” explained Rajesh Kumar, tax policy expert at Deloitte India. “For the first time, the law recognizes digital gaming as its own category rather than lumping it together with traditional gambling activities. This distinction has been needed for years as the industry has evolved into a legitimate digital entertainment sector.”

Modernizing Regulatory Approaches for a Digital Economy

The bill aims to bring India’s taxation framework into line with the digital age by creating a category that specifically addresses online gaming. This modernization reflects the sector’s significant growth, which reached $2.6 billion in FY22 and is anticipated to escalate to $8.6 billion by FY27.

“The upcoming Income Tax Bill is intended to mirror the growing prominence of online gaming in India,” notes one analysis of the legislation, highlighting how the bill “seeks to provide much-required clarity to the tax landscape for the sector and ensure that income from it is taxed appropriately.”

The gaming industry’s transformation from a niche hobby to a mainstream entertainment option has been dramatic. India now boasts over 400 million online gamers, making it one of the largest gaming markets globally. Mobile gaming in particular has seen explosive growth, with smartphones providing accessible entry points for new players across demographic groups.

“The government is finally catching up to what the industry has known for years – that online gaming represents a significant economic opportunity for India,” said Priya Mehta, CEO of a Bangalore-based gaming startup. “This recognition through separate tax classification validates the industry and should help attract more investment.”

New Taxation Mechanisms: Net Winnings and TDS Provisions

The Net Winnings Concept

A key innovation in the bill is the introduction of the concept of “net winnings” for taxation purposes. Unlike the previous approach that taxed gross winnings, the new framework focuses on net winnings calculated after adjusting for entry fees or bets. This approach aims to ensure fairer tax treatment for players by accounting for their costs of participation.

This shift acknowledges that gaming involves both expenditure and potential revenue for players, making the taxation more equitable than the previous system that taxed total winnings without considering entry costs.

“The net winnings concept addresses one of the biggest complaints from the gaming community,” explained Sunil Gupta, a chartered accountant specializing in digital entertainment taxation. “Previously, if you spent ₹90,000 to win ₹100,000, you’d be taxed on the full ₹100,000. Now, you’ll only be taxed on your actual profit of ₹10,000, which is far more reasonable.”

TDS Provisions and Implementation

While the bill maintains the existing 30% tax rate on gaming winnings, it refines the application of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) provisions. The ₹10,000 threshold for TDS remains unchanged, but it now applies specifically to net winnings exceeding this amount in a single transaction.

The bill designates online gaming companies and intermediaries as responsible for deducting and depositing TDS when crediting winnings to a player’s account or during payment. This places the administrative burden on the platforms rather than individual players, potentially improving compliance.

“Making platforms responsible for TDS implementation is a practical move,” noted Kumar. “It’s much easier to regulate a few hundred gaming companies than millions of individual players. This should significantly improve tax collection efficiency while reducing the compliance burden on players.”

Restrictions on Loss Offsetting

To ensure comprehensive taxation of gaming income, the bill explicitly prohibits the offsetting of losses from online gaming against other sources of income. Additionally, these losses cannot be carried forward to subsequent financial years. This ensures that all gaming winnings are taxed in full, regardless of a player’s performance in previous gaming activities.

“The prohibition on offsetting losses maintains the government’s revenue stream while reinforcing the idea that gaming should be treated separately from other forms of income,” said Gupta. “While some players might prefer more flexibility, this approach is consistent with how many countries treat gaming winnings globally.”

Industry Reception and Ongoing Challenges

Mixed Industry Response

The new taxation framework has been generally welcomed by tax experts for bringing clarity to a previously ambiguous area. According to industry analysts, the bill “will provide much-needed certainty in the taxation of digital gaming, ensuring that income from this sector is taxed appropriately.”

However, reactions from within the gaming industry have been mixed. While most welcome the formal recognition of online gaming as a distinct category, some express concerns about the continued high tax rates compared to global standards.

“This is a positive step forward, but India still taxes gaming at rates significantly higher than other major markets,” said Arjun Rao, president of the Indian Gaming Federation. “The 30% income tax rate on winnings, combined with the 28% GST on deposits, means India has one of the highest tax burdens on gaming globally.”

Some industry stakeholders note that India’s approach still differs significantly from global best practices. The report by the United States India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF) and TMT Law Practice highlights that many countries distinguish between skill-based games and games of chance, with skill-based games typically taxed on platform fees or Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR) at rates ranging from 2% to 25%.

The Skill vs. Chance Distinction

One significant issue that remains unaddressed is the distinction between games of skill and games of chance. In many jurisdictions globally, skill-based games receive more favorable tax treatment than chance-based gambling.

“The bill takes a step forward by separating online gaming from traditional gambling, but it still doesn’t distinguish between skill-based and chance-based digital games,” explained Vikram Singh, a gaming industry legal expert. “This distinction is crucial because skill-based games like fantasy sports or strategy games fundamentally differ from pure chance-based gambling, and ideally should be regulated differently.”

This lack of distinction continues to create regulatory uncertainty, especially as different Indian states have varied approaches to what constitutes a game of skill versus chance. The Supreme Court of India has previously ruled that games where skill predominates over chance should be treated differently from gambling, but this principle has not been consistently applied in tax legislation.

GST Challenges Remain

Despite the improved income tax classification, India’s online gaming sector still faces significant challenges from the current Goods and Services Tax (GST) structure, which imposes a 28% tax on total player deposits across all gaming formats. This rate is notably higher than global standards and remains a point of contention for the industry.

“The income tax reforms are welcome, but the GST situation continues to be a major obstacle,” said Mehta. “When players face a 28% tax just to participate, plus a 30% tax on any winnings, the combined burden makes it difficult for legitimate platforms to compete with offshore operators that avoid these taxes entirely.”

The USISPF report emphasizes that the misclassification of skill-based games with games of chance continues to stifle the growth of India’s online skill gaming industry in contexts beyond income tax. This suggests that while the Income Tax Bill 2025 represents progress, broader regulatory reform may be necessary for the industry to reach its full potential.

Looking Forward: Implications for India’s Digital Economy

The new tax classification for online gaming reflects India’s growing recognition of the digital economy’s importance. As one of the world’s fastest-growing digital markets, India has been modernizing various regulations to accommodate new business models and technologies.

“This bill should be seen in the context of India’s broader digital transformation,” explained Kumar. “The government is increasingly acknowledging that digital industries require specific regulatory approaches rather than trying to fit them into frameworks designed for traditional sectors.”

For the gaming industry, this recognition comes at a crucial time. With significant investments flowing into Indian gaming startups and international companies eyeing the market, regulatory clarity could accelerate growth. Multiple Indian gaming companies have achieved unicorn status (valuations exceeding $1 billion) in recent years, highlighting the sector’s economic potential.

“Investor confidence increases when there’s regulatory certainty,” noted Rao. “While we still have improvements to make, this clear categorization signals that India recognizes gaming as a legitimate digital industry rather than merely a form of gambling.”

Conclusion: A Significant Step in Gaming’s Evolution

The Income Tax Bill 2025 marks a significant evolution in India’s approach to taxing online gaming by creating a distinct category with specific definitions and tailored taxation mechanisms. By separating online gaming from traditional gambling and introducing the concept of net winnings, the legislation acknowledges the unique characteristics of digital gaming and aims to create a more equitable taxation framework.

While challenges remain – particularly regarding the distinction between skill-based games and games of chance and the high GST rates – this legislative development represents an important step toward recognizing the economic significance of India’s rapidly growing digital gaming sector. As the industry continues to evolve, further regulatory framework refinement may be necessary to balance taxation objectives with industry growth potential.

For now, the bill provides much-needed clarity and legitimacy to an industry that has long operated in regulatory gray areas. For players, companies, and investors alike, this represents a welcome development in India’s journey toward becoming a global gaming powerhouse.

UKGC Pilots “Frictionless” Financial Risk Checks for Online Gamblers

Britain’s gambling regulator is testing a new approach to protecting vulnerable players without disrupting recreational bettors.

The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) launched a six-month pilot program in August 2024 to evaluate financial risk assessments for online gambling customers, representing a significant change in how the industry approaches player protection. Early results show promise, with 95% of assessments completed without any customer interaction – suggesting the “frictionless” approach could work for the vast majority of players.

The initiative marks a potential turning point in gambling regulation, moving away from broad-brush approaches toward more targeted interventions.

As online gambling continues to grow in popularity, regulators face mounting pressure to prevent harm without stifling a legitimate industry that generates billions in tax revenue and employs thousands.

Key Takeaways

  • UKGC’s six-month pilot aims to identify financially vulnerable gamblers while minimizing disruption
  • 95% of initial assessments were completed without customer intervention
  • The pilot runs separately from mandatory affordability checks at £500 (dropping to £150 in February 2025)
  • Data inconsistencies between credit agencies present challenges to implementation
  • Final results expected by April 2025, potentially reshaping UK gambling regulation
  • The approach could serve as a model for other countries seeking to modernize gambling regulations
  • Industry stakeholders emphasize the importance of preventing players from moving to unregulated markets

Background: Why These Checks Matter

The UK gambling industry has faced intensifying scrutiny over its approach to player protection. Cases, where customers gambled away life-changing sums without intervention, have made headlines and prompted regulatory action. The government’s 2023 white paper “High Stakes: Gambling Reform for the Digital Age” proposed various consumer protection measures, including financial checks.

Helen Rhodes, Director of Major Policy Projects at the UKGC, has clarified the distinction between this pilot and the mandatory affordability checks now being implemented: “The Gambling Commission does not have any requirements for affordability checks and is not proposing any. Financial risk assessments would be a much more targeted way of identifying potentially financially vulnerable customers.”

The pilot addresses cases “where customers have been able to gamble large amounts without any checks or support,” which Rhodes noted have “later identified that this led to significant harm.”

Gambling addiction specialists have long argued that early identification of vulnerable players is key to preventing harm. Traditional approaches have often relied on self-exclusion schemes or monitoring gambling patterns after problems emerge.

This new approach aims to identify risk factors before serious harm occurs, using financial data that may indicate vulnerability.

How the Pilot Works

The UKGC has structured their experiment in four distinct stages:

  1. Testing what percentage of high-spending customers could receive frictionless financial risk assessments
  2. Evaluating how quickly credit reference agencies could return assessments
  3. Assessing how useful credit reference data is for understanding financial risk
  4. Examining how gambling operators can integrate assessments into their systems

Stage 1, completed in early February 2025, analyzed historical data from inactive customer accounts to test the feasibility of frictionless assessments. This involved over 530,000 evaluations across approximately 300,000 accounts, using data from three credit reference agencies.

The technical process involves operators sharing customer data with credit reference agencies, which then perform rapid assessments to identify potential financial vulnerability. Importantly, these checks don’t involve directly accessing bank statements or requiring customers to upload financial documents – an approach that has proven controversial in other contexts.

Initial Results: Better Than Expected

The first phase yielded encouraging results. Approximately 95% of assessments were successfully completed without customer interaction – meaning operator-provided data was successfully matched by credit reference agencies. This “frictionless” rate exceeded initial expectations outlined in the 2023 gambling white paper.

Of the successful matches:

  • 92% of accounts had existing financial records that could be checked
  • 3% were classified as “thin files,” indicating limited financial history

The remaining 5% of assessments were “unmatched” between operators and credit reference agencies:

  • Less than 1% failed due to data formatting issues or duplications
  • About 4% couldn’t be completed because credit agencies couldn’t identify the customer

Helen Bryce, who leads the pilot, described these results as “encouraging” while cautioning that the industry must “wait for full pilot and data collection findings to get a true estimate.”

The high match rate suggests that the vast majority of players could be assessed without any impact on their gambling experience – addressing one of the industry’s primary concerns about increased friction driving customers to unregulated offshore sites.

Challenges: The Devil in the Details

Despite the high success rate, several significant hurdles emerged:

  1. Inconsistent Results: Different credit reference agencies produced contradictory findings for the same individuals, creating potential for “confusion” in interpreting results. This raises questions about standardization and fairness in how players are assessed.
  2. Data Presentation Problems: As noted by the Commission, “credit reference agencies have unique systems and ways of presenting the findings,” which “caused some issues for pilot participants.” This inconsistency makes it difficult for operators to develop standardized responses to risk assessments.
  3. Data Quality Concerns: Various data quality issues need further exploration in subsequent stages. Some records may be outdated or incomplete, raising questions about the reliability of assessments.
  4. Privacy Considerations: Though not explicitly mentioned in early findings, data privacy experts have raised questions about how customer information is handled and whether appropriate consent mechanisms are in place.

The Betting and Gaming Council, while working with the UKGC on the pilot, emphasized that it was “crucial” no checks be introduced that risk driving bettors to unregulated black markets. This reflects the industry’s ongoing concern that excessive regulation could undermine the legal market.

The Bigger Picture: Balancing Protection and Freedom

The timing of this pilot is significant.

It runs parallel to the implementation of mandatory light-touch affordability checks introduced in August 2024, which require additional verification when players deposit more than £500 monthly. This threshold will drop to £150 from February 28, 2025.

These mandatory checks have proven controversial. Critics argue they represent unnecessary intrusion into personal finances, while supporters maintain they’re essential to prevent gambling harm. The frictionless approach being tested could offer a middle ground – providing protection without creating barriers for recreational players.

The industry has expressed concerns that excessive friction in the gambling process could push players toward unregulated offshore sites that offer no protections whatsoever.

A 2023 study by PwC estimated that approximately 460,000 UK players already use unlicensed gambling sites, wagering around £1.4 billion annually. Increasing this “black market” share could ultimately undermine player protection goals.

This pilot aims to find the sweet spot – protecting vulnerable players without creating unnecessary barriers for recreational gamblers who can afford their play. If successful, it could represent a new paradigm in gambling regulation: data-driven, targeted intervention rather than blanket restrictions.

What Happens Next?

The UKGC is proceeding with the remaining stages of the pilot according to schedule, with final completion expected by April 2025.

The second phase is currently underway, testing how quickly financial risk assessments could be integrated into real-time gambling sessions.

Stage 3 will examine the relevance and accuracy of credit reference data for understanding financial risk in the gambling context. The final stage will evaluate how operators can effectively integrate these assessments into their business processes without disrupting the customer experience.

As the pilot progresses, key questions include:

  • How will operators incorporate financial risk assessment data into their existing systems?
  • Can these checks remain truly frictionless for the majority while effectively identifying vulnerable individuals?
  • How will the industry address inconsistencies between different credit reference agencies?
  • What thresholds or triggers will prompt intervention when risk is identified?
  • How will interventions be structured to help rather than simply restrict vulnerable players?

The Commission has promised transparent reporting on findings throughout the process, with regular updates to stakeholders including gambling operators, treatment providers, and consumer advocacy groups.

Industry Impact: A New Approach to Player Protection

The outcome of this pilot could fundamentally reshape how online gambling operators approach responsible gambling in the UK. The UKGC is walking a tightrope – trying to protect vulnerable players without strangling a legitimate industry with excessive regulation.

For operators, implementing effective financial risk assessments could reduce regulatory pressure while demonstrating commitment to social responsibility. Major industry players have already invested significantly in responsible gambling measures, but these have often been criticized as inadequate or inconsistently applied.

For players, successful implementation could mean better protection for those at risk without intrusive checks for the majority. Consumer advocacy groups have cautiously welcomed the approach while emphasizing the need for strict standards and transparency.

If successful, this approach could provide a model for other jurisdictions grappling with similar challenges. Rather than imposing blanket restrictions that affect all players, it targets interventions where they’re most needed.

International Context: UK as Regulatory Pioneer

The UK has long been seen as a leader in gambling regulation, with its approach often influencing policy in other countries. This pilot continues that tradition of innovation, potentially setting standards that could be adopted globally.

Other major gambling markets are watching closely. Australia has recently implemented its own financial vulnerability checks, while several European countries are considering similar measures. The United States, with its rapidly expanding legal gambling market, may look to successful international models as individual states develop their regulatory frameworks.

What sets the UK approach apart is its emphasis on minimizing friction while maximizing protection – recognizing that excessive barriers may simply drive players to unregulated alternatives.

This pragmatic approach acknowledges the reality that gambling is a legitimate leisure activity for millions while also addressing the real harm it causes to vulnerable individuals.

Technological Considerations

The success of frictionless financial risk assessments depends heavily on technological integration between gambling operators and credit reference agencies. Real-time data exchange, secure processing, and rapid risk evaluation are essential components.

Some industry experts have suggested that blockchain technology could eventually play a role in making these assessments more efficient and secure. Smart contracts could potentially automate the process while enhancing privacy and data protection.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning also have potential applications, particularly in identifying patterns that might indicate vulnerability. However, these technologies raise additional questions about transparency and algorithmic fairness.

Conclusion: The Future of Gambling Regulation

The UKGC’s experiment with frictionless financial risk checks represents an innovative approach to gambling harm prevention. The promising early results suggest this approach could provide a viable framework for future regulation that protects vulnerable players without imposing unnecessary friction on recreational gamblers.

However, significant challenges remain in standardizing assessment criteria and integrating data from different credit reference agencies. As the pilot continues through its remaining stages, the gambling industry awaits decisions on how these financial risk assessments might be permanently implemented.

This initiative underscores the UK’s position at the forefront of gambling regulation. The country continues to develop innovative approaches to balancing consumer protection with market viability in the digital age. Finding this balance remains the central challenge of modern gambling policy for players, operators, and regulators alike.

The outcome of this pilot could mark a pivotal moment in the evolution of gambling regulation – moving from broad restrictions toward smart, targeted interventions that protect the vulnerable while respecting the freedom of responsible adults to gamble if they choose.

With final results expected by April 2025, all eyes in the gambling world are watching to see if this “frictionless” approach delivers on its promise.

Sources

Exploring gambler attitudes towards Financial Vulnerability and Financial Risk Check proposals

Financial Risk Checks Update

UKGC: Finance checks will be ‘frictionless and light tough’ on operator payments journey



New Zealand’s Upcoming Controversial Online Gambling Licensing Scheme

New Zealand is rolling the dice on a controversial new online gambling policy.

By 2026, the government will auction 15 online casino licenses, effectively ending the country’s long-standing prohibition on domestic online casinos while bringing order to the regulatory wild west where Kiwis freely access offshore gambling sites without protection.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. Officials claim the move will protect consumers and capture millions in lost tax revenue. Critics warn it’s a dangerous bet that normalizes gambling and funnels money away from communities. The question dividing the nation: is this sensible modernization or a reckless gamble with public welfare?

Key Takeaways

  • 15 online casino licenses will hit the auction block in 2026
  • Operators will pay 12% gambling duty plus other fees, totaling roughly 25% of revenue
  • Unlike pokies and other gambling, online casinos won’t fund community causes
  • Problem gambling advocates fear increased addiction and harm
  • Local operators want protection; government expects foreign companies to dominate
  • Projected annual government revenue: NZD 716 million
  • The system breaks with New Zealand’s traditional approach to gambling regulation
  • Enforcement mechanisms include fines up to NZD 5 million for violations

The Regulatory Black Hole

Right now, New Zealand’s online gambling landscape is bizarre. Domestic online casinos? Illegal. Kiwis gambling on offshore websites? Perfectly legal.

This contradiction has created a massive unregulated market worth at least NZD 304 million annually, possibly reaching NZD 3 billion in turnover. That’s larger than the racing industry and double the size of Lotto – all operating beyond government reach.

Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden pulls no punches: “New Zealand remains a haven for harmful gambling operations that scam consumers by not paying out prizes and provide a mechanism for financial crimes such as money laundering and serious fraud.”

This regulatory vacuum leaves players vulnerable. When an offshore casino refuses to pay winnings or engages in predatory practices, New Zealand gamblers have nowhere to turn. No consumer protections, no regulatory oversight, and no contribution to the country’s economy or harm reduction programs.

While most developed nations have tackled online gambling regulation, New Zealand has sat on its hands. Until now.

The Licensing Blueprint

The government’s roadmap looks like this:

  • Legislation presented by April 2025
  • Bill passed by end of 2025
  • License auction opens February 2026
  • Online casinos launch April 2026

The centerpiece: 15 three-year licenses awarded to the highest bidders. After three years, operators must reapply – giving the government leverage to cut problematic players and maintain regulatory compliance.

Licensed operators will fork over:

  • 12% gambling duty on profits
  • 13% GST
  • Problem gambling levy
  • Higher license fees

That’s about 25% of gambling revenue flowing to government coffers – “competitive” by global standards according to officials.

Players will gain some protections, including age verification (minimum age 18), advertising restrictions, continued ban on sponsorships, and Department of Internal Affairs regulatory oversight. But will these measures be sufficient to prevent increased gambling harm?

The licensing structure represents a significant departure from New Zealand’s traditional approach to gambling regulation, which typically includes strong community benefit requirements.

The Case For: Protection and Cold, Hard Cash

The government’s argument boils down to two points: protection and money.

Consumer Protection

Right now, Kiwi gamblers are playing without a safety net. Offshore operators can refuse payouts, manipulate odds, or simply vanish with deposits. There’s zero recourse when things go wrong.

The new system promises to change that with:

  • Licensed operators meeting minimum standards for fairness and security
  • Fines up to NZD 5 million for violations of regulations
  • Power to revoke licenses from bad actors
  • Better monitoring of gambling patterns and behaviors

Van Velden argues these measures create real accountability in a market currently operating in shadows: “If someone is a bad operator, DIA can always revoke their license.”

The Money Trail

Follow the money – currently, it disappears offshore. The government estimates it will collect over NZD 716 million annually once the tax kicks in. That’s serious cash currently leaving New Zealand’s economy with no benefit to public services or harm reduction efforts.

Van Velden argues regulation also brings transparency: “Once we regulate the market, we can actually capture data and figure out whether harm increases over time, whether we’re getting the harm minimisation standards correct or the advertising standards correct to make sure that we’re not incentivizing people to gamble online.”

Bringing this substantial market into the regulated fold could also potentially reduce financial crimes like money laundering and fraud that thrive in unregulated environments.

The Case Against: Harm and Community Loss

Critics aren’t buying what the government’s selling. Their concerns fall into two camps:

Addiction Explosion

Problem gambling advocates are horrified by the license numbers. Andree Froude from the Problem Gambling Foundation didn’t mince words: “We had no idea it would be as high as 15. We thought around five. How can that not increase gambling and harm?”

They’re particularly worried about advertising normalizing gambling behavior – something that will be permitted under the new rules. Froude noted that gambling advertising “just feeds into the normalization of gambling,” arguing that inducements “should be prohibited.”

The concern isn’t just theoretical. Research from other jurisdictions shows increased accessibility and advertising can lead to higher rates of problem gambling, especially among vulnerable populations. Critics argue that without stronger preventative measures, the licensing scheme could create a public health crisis.

Communities Left Empty-Handed

Here’s where it gets really interesting. New Zealand’s existing gambling operations have strict community obligations:

  • Pokies must distribute 100% of profits to community causes
  • Lotto and the TAB have significant community contribution requirements
  • Online casinos? Zero community funding requirements

Martin Cheer from Pub Charity Ltd highlighted this glaring double standard: “Effectively, in Class 4 [pokies], 100 percent all the profits have to be given away. Well, in this instance, none of it has to be given away. So instead of the local ambulance service or coast guard or football team getting money, it’s going to offshore shareholders.”

This departure from New Zealand’s traditional gambling model could leave community organizations that currently rely on gambling proceeds scrambling for funding. Sports clubs, cultural events, health services, and educational programs might all face shortfalls as gambling shifts to a sector with no community distribution requirements.

The Turf War: Local Operators vs. International Giants

The battle lines are clearly drawn between New Zealand operators and international gambling companies.

Home Team Disadvantage

SkyCity Entertainment Group, which runs three physical casinos in New Zealand, lobbied hard for just five licenses restricted to domestic companies. They argued that foreign operators would dodge taxes and drain money offshore.

In their submission, SkyCity didn’t mince words: “The safest way to make sure online casino profits are subject to New Zealand income tax is to only allow incorporated New Zealand companies to hold licenses and not permit a license to be held by a foreign company or a New Zealand branch of a foreign company.”

The TAB went further, warning that “an open online casinos market threatens the viability of all domestic gambling operators for the benefit of offshore multinational organisations, putting at risk established funding streams for racing and sport.” They recommended limiting licenses to 5-7 and restricting them to New Zealand-based entities.

These arguments reflect genuine concern about market dominance by international operators, but also transparently protect their own commercial interests.

Government Bets on Open Market

Van Velden dismissed these arguments as self-interest: “They are looking out for themselves. I’m not here to look out for Sky City. I’m not here to look out for any established particular casino or their brands. I’m here to make sure that we have a fair marketplace and a fair, regulated market.”

She further argued that restricting licenses to domestic operators would potentially violate New Zealand’s free trade agreements – introducing legal complications that could undermine the entire regulatory framework.

Van Velden acknowledged foreign companies will likely dominate but defended the approach as creating necessary market competition. The three-year license terms provide an opportunity to reassess and adjust the system as needed, potentially creating more opportunities for domestic operators over time.

International Players at the Table

The government has been surprisingly candid about who they expect to win licenses: large international gambling companies with established online operations.

Van Velden stated plainly, “We don’t have a huge online gambling market, so I would expect that it’s mainly offshore providers.”

Major players already circling include:

  • 888 Holdings
  • Bet365
  • Betway

Domestic companies like SkyCity and Christchurch Casino have also indicated their intention to bid, but they’ll be competing against global giants with vastly more experience in the online gambling space.

Why 15 licenses? A November 2024 Cabinet paper revealed the government worried that additional requirements might scare off bidders: “By adding further financial requirements on top of tax, duties and levies, New Zealand would become one of the highest taxed jurisdictions for online gambling, making licenses less valuable and attractive.”

The same paper noted that “evidence from overseas has seen operators pull out of markets to protect their profits when their operating costs are increased by tax and duty changes.”

Translation: attracting international operators trumped tougher social responsibility measures.

Dollars vs. Social Responsibility

The fundamental tension here is painfully obvious. New Zealand is trying to thread the needle between maximizing economic benefits and minimizing social harm.

The government claims regulation provides better protection than the status quo of unregulated access. Critics counter that the proposed system favors industry profits over public welfare. Both sides have valid points.

The decision to exempt online casinos from community funding requirements that apply to every other gambling sector speaks volumes. Cabinet papers reveal the government feared making licenses less commercially attractive – essentially admitting they prioritized commercial appeal over stronger social protections.

But there’s also a legitimate argument that bringing this market into the open creates opportunities for better monitoring, intervention, and harm reduction that simply don’t exist in the current unregulated environment.

The Real Test Lies Ahead

As 2026 approaches, all eyes will be on New Zealand’s gambling experiment. Success won’t be measured by revenue alone, but by whether the system delivers on its promise of safer gambling without increasing addiction.

Critics fear a gambling boom fueled by advertising and easy access. Supporters envision a better-regulated industry with proper safeguards. The reality will likely fall somewhere in between.

The government is basically admitting that online gambling is here to stay regardless of prohibition. They’re betting regulation is better than the wild west status quo. Whether that bet pays off for New Zealand society – not just government coffers – remains the million-dollar question.

What’s certain is that this represents a fundamental shift in New Zealand’s approach to gambling regulation. The country is moving from prohibition to managed access, from community benefit requirements to commercial attractiveness, and from domestic protection to international competition.

For better or worse, New Zealand is about to join the global online gambling community. The cards have been dealt – now we wait to see what hand the country ends up with.

Sources

Brazil’s iGaming Gold Rush: How Local Operators Outmaneuver Global Giants

Brazil’s foray into iGaming has sparked a digital gold rush.

With sports betting legalized since December 2018 and regulations only finalized in 2023, the market officially launched in 2024 and quickly emerged as one of the largest in Latin America. Local operators are thriving and strategically outmaneuvering global competitors through deep cultural insights, innovative payment solutions, and robust regulatory compliance.

Key Takeaways:

  • Explosive Market Growth: Brazil’s iGaming market, launched in 2024, is estimated at $1.6 billion and could surge to $3.5 billion by 2026, driven by a large population and high smartphone penetration.
  • Regulatory Environment: Operators face a 16% tax on Gross Gaming Revenue and substantial licensing fees, along with strict responsible gambling and AML requirements.
  • Local Advantages: Deep cultural insights, strategic partnerships (e.g., with football clubs), and integration with popular payment methods like PIX give local operators a competitive edge.
  • Global vs. Local: While international giants struggle with localization and regulatory hurdles, local brands such as Galera.bet, Esportes da Sorte, and Bet7k are leveraging their knowledge of the market to capture significant market share.
  • Future Consolidation: The potential for mergers and acquisitions may see global operators acquiring successful local brands, cementing Brazil’s role as a hub for Latin American iGaming.

A Market Poised for Growth

Brazil’s iGaming market is a force to be reckoned with:

  • Market Size: Estimated at $1.6 billion in 2024, with projections soaring to $3.5 billion by 2026.
  • Population and Penetration: With a population of 214 million and an 85% smartphone penetration rate, the stage is set for explosive digital growth.
  • Football Fever: Brazil’s passion for football provides a natural synergy with sports betting, driving high levels of engagement and fan loyalty.

The Regulatory Landscape: Challenges and Opportunities

Framework and Fiscal Requirements

Brazil’s regulatory environment is both rigorous and unique:

  • Taxation: Operators face a 16% tax on Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR), a figure that reflects the government’s intent to harness significant revenue from the burgeoning market.
  • Licensing: A hefty fee of R$22.2 million (approximately $4.5 million) is required for a five-year license, underscoring the seriousness with which regulators approach the industry.
  • Compliance: Strict responsible gambling and anti-money laundering (AML) measures ensure that only those operators with the highest accountability standards can participate.

The Local Advantage

Local operators have turned regulatory challenges into strategic advantages:

  • Cultural Insights: An intimate understanding of Brazilian sports and culture allows operators to tailor products that resonate with the local audience.
  • Strategic Partnerships: Collaborations with local football clubs and media outlets have effectively built trust and brand loyalty.
  • Payment Integration: With PIX – a popular instant payment system – accounting for 70% of deposits, local operators enjoy a seamless and efficient financial ecosystem.

Key Players and Their Strategies

Galera.bet: A Market Leader

Galera.bet has quickly risen to prominence, capturing an estimated 40% market share. Its strategic partnership with football superstar Neymar Jr. has not only boosted its profile but also deepened its connection with Brazilian fans.

Esportes da Sorte and Bet7k: Innovating for the Future

  • Esportes da Sorte holds a 25% market share, leveraging sponsorships with 15 football clubs to create engaging betting experiences that combine digital platforms with on-the-ground sports culture.
  • Bet7k focuses on a mobile-first approach, with 15% of the market. Its intuitive, app-based interface caters to a generation of users who demand speed and convenience.

Global Giants Meet Local Mastery

While international operators like Bet365, Flutter Entertainment, and Entain have significant resources, they face several hurdles in Brazil:

  • Localization Challenges: Global brands struggle with payment processing and cultural nuances. For example, issues with processing local payment methods like PIX have hampered their efforts.
  • Regulatory Barriers: Stringent local regulations and advertising restrictions on international campaigns put global operators at a disadvantage.
  • Market Positioning: Local operators’ deep-rooted connections with Brazilian culture and sports give them an edge in marketing and customer engagement.

Marketing and Customer Acquisition

Local operators excel at leveraging influencer marketing and regional sports sponsorships. Their deep understanding of the local market allows them to craft campaigns that speak directly to Brazilian consumers. In contrast, global brands often find themselves hampered by international advertising restrictions and higher operational costs.

Payment Solutions and Future Outlook

The PIX Revolution

PIX is a game changer in Brazil’s iGaming landscape:

  • Widespread Adoption: With 70% of deposits made through PIX, local operators benefit from an established, trusted payment system that offers speed and reliability.
  • Crypto Integration: While crypto adoption is still in its early stages, local exchanges are beginning to partner with sportsbooks, hinting at a future where digital currencies could further disrupt the market.

The Road Ahead: Consolidation and Innovation

Looking forward, the Brazilian iGaming market is expected to undergo significant consolidation:

  • Mergers and Acquisitions: Global giants may seek to acquire successful local brands to overcome their localization challenges, further fueling market growth.
  • Hub Potential: With its favorable demographics and regulatory environment, Brazil is on track to become a central hub for Latin American iGaming operations.

Challenges and Critical Success Factors

Navigating a Crowded Market

The success of local operators hinges on their ability to maintain a competitive edge against well-funded global players. Key factors include:

  • Regulatory Navigation: Securing and maintaining licenses in an environment with strict compliance standards.
  • Innovation in Payment and Marketing: Continued investment in technologies such as mobile integration and advanced payment systems like PIX.
  • Cultural Adaptation: Leveraging local insights to create products and campaigns that resonate with Brazilian consumers.

Global Giants’ Struggles

Global operators face uphill battles in adapting to the local landscape:

  • Localization Issues: Difficulties in customizing products for the Brazilian market, from language to payment methods.
  • High Costs: The expense of acquiring new customers in a saturated market often leads to lower margins.
  • Regulatory Friction: Navigating Brazil’s complex regulatory framework can slow down the deployment of new products and marketing strategies.

Final Reflections

Brazil’s iGaming gold rush represents both an enormous opportunity and a formidable challenge.

Local operators, armed with cultural insights, strategic partnerships, and robust payment solutions, are outmaneuvering their global counterparts in ways that could redefine the future of the industry in Latin America.

The road ahead is full of potential – if local players continue to innovate and global giants adjust their strategies. As the market grows from an estimated $1.6 billion in 2024 to a projected $3.5 billion by 2026, the balance of power in Brazil’s iGaming sector could very well shift permanently in favor of the locals.

Sources

Thailand Prohibits Online Gambling Under the New Casino Bill: Operators Be Aware

Thailand is shaking up its casino scene.

A new bill is set to ban online gambling and remote gaming services, forcing operators to stick to brick-and-mortar venues. The law packs a punch and leaves little room for digital workarounds.

In a nutshell, if it isn’t in a land-based casino, it isn’t allowed.

Key Highlights:

  • No Online Gambling: Any form of online betting is strictly banned. 1
  • No Remote Gaming Services: Casinos can’t offer gaming via the internet or electronic devices. 1
  • Live-Streaming Out: Broadcasting casino games live is prohibited. 23
  • Proxy Betting is Off-Limits: Remote or proxy gambling won’t be tolerated. 2

A New Gambling Era: Strict Provisions That Change the Game

Thailand’s new casino bill marks a complete shift in how casinos will operate.

Gone are the days when operators could dip into online gambling with ease. With digital channels closed off, every game must now happen within the casino’s physical walls.

The law’s core message is simple: protect consumers and control gambling tightly. The focus is on minimizing the social impact of gambling by preventing the easy access that online platforms provide. This cautious approach underlines the government’s commitment to public welfare over market expansion.

Breaking Down the Key Prohibitions

Online Gambling Ban

Every online gambling activity is strictly off-limits. Whether it’s through websites, mobile apps, or any other digital means, operators are not allowed to offer online betting. The bill makes no excuses – if it’s online, it’s banned. This prohibition targets all digital forms of gambling, leaving no loopholes for remote play.

Remote Gaming Services Prohibited

The law also disallows any form of remote gaming. This means casinos can’t offer games that can be played via the internet or electronic devices. The goal is to ensure that every game is conducted in person. In effect, casinos will have to rely solely on foot traffic, rather than the vast online audience. 1

Live-Streaming Ban

A striking feature of the bill is its ban on live-streaming gambling activities. This measure is designed to prevent people from participating remotely, even if they’re just watching a live feed. By outlawing live broadcasts of casino games, the bill aims to cut off any avenue for digital gambling.

Proxy and Remote Betting Outlawed

Operators cannot set up any proxy systems that allow for remote betting. The law is designed to close all potential backdoors, ensuring that no digital workaround can be used to offer online gambling. This means that even indirect participation through proxy betting will be met with strict penalties.

Specific Restrictions for Thai: What the Bill Says

The bill leaves little to chance. Sections 61 and 62 clearly outline the prohibitions on online gambling and live-streaming. These sections are the backbone of the new law, explicitly stating that gambling must be confined to physical casino premises.

  • Section 61 & 62: These parts clearly state that online gambling and live-streaming of casino activities are forbidden. Even if someone is watching a game from outside the casino, that’s considered participation in remote gambling – and it’s not allowed.
  • No Digital Loopholes: The law is designed to block any attempts at bypassing the restrictions. Whether through proxy servers or other digital means, all remote gambling is off the table.

Implications for Casino Operators

For casino operators in Thailand, the new bill means a radical transformation of business strategies. Without the ability to offer online or remote gaming, operators must adapt to a strictly physical model. Here’s how the changes break down:

Limited Market Reach

Operators will no longer be able to tap into the vast online audience. Their market will be confined to on-premises customers, which could drastically reduce the potential customer base. This shift means that casinos will have to rely entirely on attracting foot traffic, limiting their growth potential compared to regions that embrace online gambling.

No Online Expansion

Unlike other jurisdictions that see online platforms as an opportunity for expansion, Thailand’s law leaves no room for digital growth. Casino operators can’t use online channels to supplement or boost their revenues. Instead, they must focus on traditional, land-based operations – a significant setback for any operator looking to diversify.

Compliance Challenges

Meeting the new requirements won’t be easy. Operators will need to implement strict measures to ensure no remote gaming slips through the cracks. This includes investing in advanced technology to block unauthorized access and preventing any form of proxy betting. Failure to comply could result in severe penalties, including license revocation and hefty fines.

Technological Investments

To align with the law, casinos will be forced to invest in systems that prevent any digital bypasses. This might involve upgrading security measures, installing robust network controls, and ensuring that all digital channels are thoroughly monitored. The cost of such investments could be significant, particularly for smaller operators who have relied on a hybrid model of physical and online services.

Heightened Focus on Physical Presence

With the digital frontier closed, the emphasis shifts entirely to the physical casino experience. Operators must ramp up efforts to attract visitors through on-site promotions, improved amenities, and enhanced entertainment offerings. This focus might increase marketing expenses and necessitate upgrades to facilities to stand out in a competitive market.

Reduced International Appeal

The strict local regulations make the Thai market less attractive to international casino operators. Major players, accustomed to the flexibility of multi-channel operations, might shy away from a market where digital offerings are completely off-limits. This could lead to a decrease in foreign investment and a more insular gaming industry in Thailand.

Why Is Thailand Taking This Approach?

Thailand’s cautious stance on gambling legalization is driven by a desire to control the potential negative social impacts of gambling.

The government is clear: the risks associated with online gambling – such as addiction, financial ruin, and social disruption – are too high. By banning online and remote gaming, authorities hope to create a safer, more controlled gambling environment.

This approach prioritizes public welfare over market expansion. Rather than chasing revenue from the booming online gambling industry, the focus is on ensuring that all gambling activity happens in a regulated, physical setting where authorities can monitor and control it more effectively.

Voices from the Field

People involved in Thai online gambling are not happy about the news, but they’re ready to adapt.

Let’s see what they have to say:

Casino Operators’ Perspective

Operators are feeling the heat. Many see the new bill as a double-edged sword. On one hand, it’s a chance to promote a more traditional, in-person gaming experience. On the other, the loss of online revenue streams could be a major setback.

“Online gaming has been a key growth driver for us,” one operator confided during a recent industry conference. “Losing that channel means we have to work much harder to attract customers to our physical locations, which could be a steep challenge.”

Regulatory Outlook

Regulators, meanwhile, are sticking to their guns. Their message is unequivocal: public safety and social welfare come first. “Our goal is to protect consumers from the dangers of unchecked online gambling,” stated a spokesperson from the regulatory body. “By confining gambling to physical premises, we can enforce stricter controls and reduce the risk of gambling-related harm.”

Consumer Advocates

Consumer groups have largely welcomed the new measures. They argue that the bill is a necessary step in curbing the proliferation of online gambling, which has been linked to rising rates of addiction and financial hardship. Advocates believe that by closing the digital door, Thailand can foster a safer, more responsible gambling culture.

The Road Ahead: Adjusting to a Digital Blackout

For casino operators, the coming months will be critical.

The industry is facing a period of significant transition as operators adjust to the new regulatory landscape. Here are some strategies and challenges to keep an eye on:

  • Revamping Business Models: Operators will need to rethink their strategies. With online channels no longer an option, there will be a renewed focus on enhancing the physical casino experience. This might involve improved customer service, exclusive in-casino promotions, and investments in entertainment and dining options.
  • Strengthening Compliance: Ensuring strict adherence to the new rules is non-negotiable. Operators must invest in technology and training to monitor for any signs of remote gaming. Regular audits and internal compliance checks will become standard practice.
  • Attracting Foot Traffic: With digital marketing off the table, casinos will have to get creative in drawing in visitors. This could mean more localized marketing efforts, partnerships with travel and tourism companies, and community-focused events.
  • Managing Costs: The financial burden of new compliance measures and facility upgrades may be significant. Operators will need to balance these costs against potentially reduced revenues from the absence of online gaming.
  • Reassessing Market Appeal: The strict focus on physical operations might also shift the market dynamics. International investors and major casino brands, which have thrived in more flexible regulatory environments, might hesitate to enter a market with such stringent restrictions.

Closing Thoughts

Thailand’s new casino bill marks a decisive moment in the country’s gambling history.

By banning online gambling and remote gaming services, the government is taking a hardline stance aimed at protecting consumers and minimizing the social risks associated with digital betting. While the move is likely to limit market expansion and challenge existing business models, it reflects a broader commitment to public welfare.

For operators, the transition will be demanding.

The focus now shifts entirely to on-premises operations, demanding innovation in traditional casino management and significant investments in compliance and security.

Sources:

Europe Cracks Down on Online Gambling Advertising in 2025: What You Need to Know

Europe’s gambling scene is getting a serious makeover in 2025.

As online gambling operators scramble to adapt, governments are rolling out tougher advertising rules aimed squarely at protecting consumers and curbing reckless betting habits. This isn’t just regulatory fluff – it’s a real game-changer for the industry.

Key Highlights:

  • UK: New rules limit aggressive online promotions, empower consumers to opt out, and tighten age verification and financial checks.
  • Netherlands: Plans to raise the gambling age from 18 to 21, enforce strict deposit limits, and clamp down on online ads.
  • Italy: Nearly a total ban on gambling ads forces big operators like PokerStars to pause all promos.
  • Sweden: Aggressive marketing tactics are being phased out as regulators crack down on ads targeting new players.
  • EU & Google: A push for harmonized rules is underway, with Google updating its ad policies to align with these new measures.

A New Era for Gambling Ads Begins

In a nutshell, 2025 is shaping up to be a banner year for online gambling regulation across Europe.

The old days of flashy, relentless gambling ads are fading fast as governments get serious about consumer protection. Gone are the days when you’d be bombarded with high-octane marketing that made it all too easy to get hooked. Instead, expect a more controlled, measured approach that puts people first.

Across the continent, regulators are eyeing everything from age restrictions and financial vulnerability checks to limits on how and where gambling ads appear. And it’s not just about dialing back on the ads.

There’s a broader strategy at work here – a strategy to safeguard a generation that’s particularly at risk of falling prey to gambling’s dark side.

Country-by-Country Breakdown

Let’s have a look at what policies each country’s been working on:

United Kingdom: Consumer Choice Takes Center Stage

The UK is leading the charge with a new set of rules that went live on May 1, 2025. The Gambling Commission isn’t messing around.

Here’s what they’ve rolled out:

  • Cutting the Ad Clutter: Operators must now tone down their online game promotions. Gone are the days of bombastic, over-the-top campaigns designed to grab your attention every second.
  • Opt-Out Options: Consumers can now decide if they want to be targeted by gambling ads. This gives people the power to choose and helps reduce unwanted exposure.
  • Financial Safety Nets: A light-touch financial check is now part of the package. This means operators need to verify that their customers are in a good place financially before they’re hit with more ads.
  • Stricter Age Checks: Land-based venues aren’t off the hook either – they now have to enforce tougher age verification processes.

The UK’s new approach isn’t just about policing ads; it’s about giving consumers more control and protecting them from the pitfalls of irresponsible gambling. You can read all about it in the UK Gambling Commission’s official press release.

Netherlands: A Bold Step to Protect Young Adults

Things are heating up in the Netherlands. The Dutch government is not just tweaking the rules – they’re overhauling them.

Here’s what’s on the table:

  • Raising the Age: The government is set to bump the minimum age for high-risk gambling from 18 to 21. This move targets young adults, who, studies show, are more likely to fall into dangerous gambling patterns. Research suggests nearly 18% of young adult gamblers are at risk compared to their older counterparts.
  • Deposit Limits: Strict deposit caps are coming into play. If you go over the limit, you’ll face a financial check to see if you can handle it. It’s a move designed to stop gambling debts from spiraling out of control.
  • Ad Restrictions: Online advertising isn’t immune. The new rules will target online promotions, ensuring that they’re not reaching underage or overly vulnerable audiences.
  • Stronger Oversight: The Dutch regulators are getting more muscle. They’ll have the power to block non-compliant operators and even suspend licenses if necessary.

The Dutch move is all about prevention.

By setting a higher age and enforcing tougher financial checks, the Netherlands aims to prevent problem gambling before it becomes a public health issue.

Italy: When Advertising Goes on a Time-Out

Italy isn’t playing games either. With the introduction of the Dignity Decree, Italy has nearly banned gambling advertising altogether.

Major operators, including PokerStars, have had to pull the plug on their ad campaigns.

  • The Ban in Action: The decree forces operators to stop all gambling-related promotional activities. It’s a drastic measure, but one aimed squarely at reducing the temptations that fuel gambling addiction.
  • Public Welfare Focus: The Italian government’s decision is driven by a strong desire to protect citizens from the lure of constant gambling ads. The idea is simple: less advertising means fewer opportunities for people to get sucked into risky betting habits.

Sweden: Dialing Down the Hype

Sweden has also stepped up its game, with the market overseen by Spelinspektionen now subject to some of the most stringent ad restrictions in Europe.

  • No More Hype: Aggressive advertising is off the table. The regulators have cracked down on the flashiness that once characterized many gambling ads.
  • Targeted Moderation: The focus is especially on new player promotions. The idea is to curb the kind of marketing that could spur impulsive, risky bets.
  • Consumer-First Approach: The overall goal is to create a more balanced gambling environment that doesn’t pester vulnerable consumers with nonstop ads.

Sweden’s approach is all about cutting through the noise and ensuring that the industry remains responsible in its marketing practices.

EU-Wide Trends: A Coordinated Push for Safer Gambling

It’s not just about what each country is doing on its own. There’s a clear EU-wide trend here:

  1. Harmonization: While every country has its own rules, there’s a strong push toward standardizing regulations across the EU. This is about creating a level playing field and reducing the patchwork of rules that can confuse both operators and consumers. Learn more
  2. Player Protection: At the heart of these efforts is a focus on protecting consumers. New rules emphasize responsible gambling, fairness, and transparency.
  3. Tighter Online Ad Controls: Digital marketing for gambling is getting a serious trim. Operators are being forced to rein in their online ad campaigns, ensuring they don’t target vulnerable groups.
  4. Age and Financial Checks: There’s a notable trend towards raising the minimum age and implementing financial vulnerability assessments, as seen in both the UK and the Netherlands.

These changes are setting the stage for a much safer and more controlled gambling environment across Europe.

Google Joins the Party: New Policy Updates

In a move that underscores how far-reaching these changes are, Google has updated its gambling and gaming ads policies. Starting April 14, 2025, Google’s new rules include:

  • Stricter Definitions: Google has refined what counts as “gambling” and “gambling-promoting content.” This means fewer loopholes for advertisers.
  • Country-Specific Rules: The updated policy tailors restrictions to each country’s regulations, ensuring ads are compliant with local laws.
  • Social Casino Games: There are new rules specifically for social casino games, which now need to be clearly distinguished from traditional gambling.
  • Clear Category Distinctions: Google now clearly separates “online non-casino games” from traditional gambling, each with its own set of requirements.

These updates reflect a broader move by tech companies to align their platforms with new regulatory standards. Check out the Google policy update announcement for more details.

The Bigger Picture: What It All Means

At its core, this regulatory shake-up is about protecting people. With aggressive gambling ads becoming a thing of the past, the hope is that fewer vulnerable consumers will fall into dangerous betting habits. But there’s more to it than that.

Protecting the Vulnerable

The new rules target groups that are particularly at risk. Young adults, for instance, are statistically more likely to develop gambling problems. With studies showing that nearly 18% of young gamblers fall into dangerous patterns compared to older players, raising the minimum age in places like the Netherlands is a smart move. It’s all about nipping the problem in the bud before it escalates into a full-blown crisis.

Economic and Market Impact

Operators aren’t exactly thrilled. With tighter rules, there’s bound to be some short-term pain. Advertising budgets might shrink, and growth could slow as companies adjust to the new normal. But in the long run, a healthier, more sustainable market is the goal. The idea is that a safer, more responsible gambling environment will build consumer trust – and that trust is good for business.

A Global Trend

Europe’s moves might well set a precedent for the rest of the world. As governments grapple with the social costs of gambling, this new regulatory framework could become a model for other regions. The balance between consumer protection and market innovation is delicate, but the message is clear: public welfare comes first.

Ongoing Challenges

Of course, the road ahead isn’t without bumps. There’s a risk that overly strict rules could drive some players to unregulated, offshore platforms – places without safety nets. Regulators will need to keep a close eye on this and be ready to tweak the rules as needed. The goal is to strike the right balance between protecting consumers and keeping the market viable.

Voices from the Field React to the News

Everyone in the industry was taken by storm. Let’s see what they’re all about:

What Industry Insiders Are Saying

Some operators are sounding the alarm, worried that these measures could slow down the market. “We understand the need for consumer protection,” one industry expert commented at a recent conference, “but there’s a fine line between safeguarding players and stifling growth.” There’s concern that if the rules are too tight, risk-prone gamblers might simply migrate to less regulated spaces.

Regulators Weigh In

On the flip side, regulators remain steadfast. “Our top priority is to keep consumers safe,” said a spokesperson from the UK Gambling Commission. Dutch officials, too, are confident that raising the age limit and enforcing deposit caps will prevent gambling from turning into a public health disaster. It’s a bold move, and one that’s backed by research and real-world data.

Consumer Advocates

Consumer groups are largely in favor of the new measures. They argue that a reduction in aggressive marketing will help protect vulnerable individuals – especially young people from the constant barrage of gambling ads. These groups are also calling for more education on the risks of gambling, suggesting that rules alone won’t solve the problem.

Looking Ahead: What’s Next for iGaming?

As we move further into 2025, the regulatory frameworks will continue to evolve. Here are a few things to watch:

  • Compliance and Enforcement: Regulators will need to monitor how well operators stick to the new rules. Expect regular reviews and updates as issues emerge.
  • Market Adjustments: Operators might shift their marketing strategies, moving away from high-pressure ads and toward more responsible promotion tactics.
  • Consumer Reactions: The success of these measures will ultimately depend on how consumers respond. Will they feel more protected, or will they find ways around the restrictions?
  • International Influence: Europe’s approach might inspire similar reforms elsewhere, setting a new global standard for online gambling advertising.

Final Thoughts

The regulatory changes hitting Europe in 2025 are anything but minor.

They signal a major shift in how online gambling is promoted and consumed – a shift driven by a genuine desire to protect people from the risks of aggressive advertising and unbridled gambling habits. From the UK’s consumer-first rules to the Netherlands’ bold age limit increase, and Italy’s near-total ad ban to Sweden’s crackdown on high-pressure marketing, each country is taking a stand.

Even tech giants like Google are getting in on the action, updating their policies to ensure ads align with these new norms. This comprehensive approach touches every part of the gambling ecosystem.

One thing is clear: the days of unchecked, aggressive gambling advertising are numbered. As Europe takes these decisive steps, the hope is that consumers will end up better protected, and the market will evolve into something more responsible and sustainable.

For now, industry players, regulators, and consumers alike are bracing for a period of adjustment. It’s a challenging transition, but if done right, it could pave the way for a safer, fairer gambling environment that benefits everyone in the long run.

Sources:

Germany’s New Esports Betting Laws: What Operators Must Know

Germany’s esports betting market faces a significant regulatory shift under the State Treaty on Gambling 2021 (Glücksspielstaatsvertrag). In 2025, operators must navigate tighter compliance requirements and uncertain classifications of esports betting, creating both challenges and opportunities.

Key Takeaways

  • Uncertain Classification: Esports betting is reviewed case-by-case, with team-based events more likely to be approved.
  • Tight Restrictions: Prohibited markets, deposit limits, and mandatory player protections are central to the new regulations.
  • Enforcement: The GGL rigorously enforces compliance, with penalties for unlicensed operations.
  • Political Uncertainty: Upcoming elections and legal challenges add complexity to the regulatory landscape.
  • Strategic Adaptation: Pre-approval partnerships, localized compliance, and active lobbying are crucial for operators.

The Legal Status of Esports Betting in Germany

Under the 2021 treaty, sports betting is defined as wagering on “sporting competitions between people according to defined rules.”

Although esports is not outright banned, its status as a sport remains unclear. The Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder (GGL) reviews each esports event individually. Team-based games such as Counter-Strike 2 or League of Legends are more likely to be approved, while solo-player titles often encounter tougher scrutiny.

Germany’s licensing authority in Darmstadt has been cautious about esports events. Operators must provide detailed documentation for every esports title they wish to offer, including game rules and integrity measures.

Main Restrictions & Compliance Requirements

New rules include several restrictions to protect players and maintain market integrity:

  • Prohibited Markets: Operators cannot offer bets on amateur leagues, which are seen as more vulnerable to manipulation. Live betting on esports is also currently banned.
  • Player Protection Measures: A €1,000 monthly deposit limit has been set across all gambling activities. Strict ID verification and affordability checks are required for high-risk players.
  • Taxation: Esports betting revenue is taxed at 5.3% on stakes. A 2024 ruling in Hesse noted that this tax contributes to a high black market share, though changes are not expected until at least 2027.

Regulatory Authority & Enforcement

The GGL enforces these regulations strictly. Measures include IP blocking to shut down unlicensed platforms and maintaining a whitelist of approved operators, such as Neo.bet and Bet365.

Non-compliant operators can face fines of up to €500,000.

Political & Legal Challenges

Political and legal uncertainties add further complexity.

With upcoming federal elections, a CDU/CSU-led government might eventually ease some restrictions. However, current state-level control keeps reforms on hold. Additionally, ongoing lawsuits by players claiming that pre-2021 bets were illegal are being reviewed by courts, with a decision from the European Court of Justice expected later in 2025.

Strategic Recommendations for Operators

Operators should adopt several strategies to navigate the evolving landscape:

  • Pre-Approval Partnerships: Collaborate with established esports leagues like ESL Pro League to help certify events as sporting competitions.
  • Localized Compliance: Work with payment providers such as Paysafecard and Giropay to ensure transactions meet German standards.
  • Lobbying Efforts: Join industry groups such as the German Sports Betting Association to advocate for clearer definitions and more favorable regulations, especially ahead of the 2027 treaty review.

Closing Thoughts: Is Esports Betting over in Germany?

Germany’s esports betting market offers potential for growth but demands strict adherence to new regulatory standards.

Operators must balance innovative offerings with detailed compliance measures to succeed in this challenging environment. As Dr. Wulf Hambach, a Hamburg-based lawyer, advises, “The path to profitability lies in patience – and playing by the GGL’s rules.”

The evolving market presents a promising opportunity for companies prepared to invest in robust compliance and strategic partnerships.

Sources:

The Netherlands’ Bold Bet on Safer Gambling: Raising the Minimum Age for Slots to 21

The Dutch government is preparing a landmark change in its gambling policy.

A new bill will raise the minimum age for high-risk gambling – from online slots to other betting games – from 18 to 21. This move aims to reduce gambling addiction and prevent financial hardship among young adults. With clear-cut measures and firm timelines, this initiative reflects a strong commitment to public safety and consumer protection.

But what is the reason behind these harsh changes, and will they really help? Let’s find out!

Background and Context

In recent years, the rise of online gambling has brought both excitement and concern.

The accessibility of online slots and other gambling activities has made it easier for younger individuals to engage in high-risk behaviors. Studies indicate that the 18- to 24-year-old group is particularly vulnerable.

Researchers have found that nearly 18% of young adult gamblers exhibit dangerous patterns compared to their older peers.

The bill comes on the heels of growing concerns over the effectiveness of existing regulations. The current Remote Gambling Act (KOA) has been criticized for falling short in protecting young players. The Scientific Research and Data Centre (WODC) has highlighted gaps in the framework, arguing that the policies in place do not create a sustainable or safe gambling environment.

In response, State Secretary for Legal Protection Teun Struycken and his team have introduced a series of reforms that extend well beyond simply raising the minimum age.

Teun Struycken

Key Provisions of the Proposed Bill

Here are the main highlights from the upcoming gambling regulations changes:

1. Raising the Minimum Legal Age to 21

The centerpiece of the new legislation is the increase in the legal age for high-risk gambling activities.

The government believes that by setting the age limit at 21, it can better protect young adults during a critical period of their lives. This measure is seen as a preventive step to reduce the risk of gambling addiction before individuals are exposed to high-risk environments.

  • Objective: Shield young adults from premature exposure to gambling risks.
  • Data-Driven Decision: Nearly one in five young adult gamblers shows risky behavior patterns12.
  • Targeted Impact: Aims to protect a vulnerable demographic and reduce long-term financial problems.

2. Imposing Strict Deposit Limits

The bill goes further by proposing strict deposit limits across all gambling platforms.

The new rules will require players to undergo financial checks if they exceed preset deposit thresholds. These checks are designed to confirm that players can manage their gambling expenditures without facing undue financial hardship.

  • Financial Assessments: Mandatory checks for players exceeding deposit limits.
  • Preventive Measures: Helps identify potential financial distress before it escalates.
  • Broader Impact: Limits the amount of money that can be lost quickly, reducing the risk of spiraling into debt.

3. Tightening Advertising Restrictions

Advertising has long played a role in promoting gambling, especially to younger audiences.

The new bill proposes a significant tightening of advertising rules. While existing bans restrict promotions on TV, radio, and public spaces, online advertising will see even stricter limits. Online promotions will soon be confined to audiences aged 24 and above.

  • Expanded Ban: Extends existing restrictions to cover more media channels.
  • Youth Protection: Reduces exposure to persuasive marketing among vulnerable age groups.
  • Enforcement: Strengthens oversight by the regulatory authorities to ensure compliance.

4. Empowering the Regulatory Authority

The Kansspelautoriteit (KSA), the Dutch gambling regulator, will receive enhanced powers under the new legislation.

kansspelautoriteit

These powers include the authority to block illegal gambling websites and suspend licenses for operators who fail to meet the new standards. The aim is to create a more robust enforcement mechanism that safeguards players and maintains market integrity.

  • New Powers for KSA: Ability to block websites and suspend non-compliant licenses.
  • Market Oversight: A stronger regulatory framework helps maintain legal market integrity.
  • Consumer Protection: Directly supports the overall goal of reducing gambling-related harm.

Industry and Expert Opinions on the Matter

The proposed reforms have sparked intense debate among industry experts and market insiders.

Government Perspective

State Secretary Teun Struycken has been clear about the need for reform.

In press conferences and official statements, he has emphasized the government’s commitment to protecting vulnerable groups. His stance is that the data clearly show young adults are at a higher risk, and the current laws are not enough to counter these risks.

  • Official Stance: The government aims to reduce gambling-related harm.
  • Data Support: Cites studies and research findings as the basis for reform12.
  • Long-Term Vision: Focused on the overall well-being and financial stability of young citizens.

Concerns from the Gambling Industry

Despite the government’s strong justification, several industry experts and operators have expressed reservations.

Michael Groothuizen, chairman of the KSA, warned that raising the age might inadvertently drive young players toward unregulated, offshore gambling sites. Such platforms typically lack the strict safeguards of licensed operators, potentially putting players at even greater risk34.

  • Unintended Consequences: Risk of pushing high-risk players to illegal markets.
  • Market Impact: Concerns about how strict deposit limits might shift players away from regulated platforms.
  • Balance Needed: Industry insiders argue for a careful balance between protection and market sustainability.

Expert and Academic Views

Academics and independent researchers have also weighed in on the proposal.

Many agree that the new measures are a step in the right direction. However, some caution that age restrictions alone might not fully address the broader issues of gambling addiction. Comprehensive support systems, such as counseling and financial education, are needed to tackle the root causes of gambling behavior.

  • Multifaceted Issue: Age limits are just one part of a broader solution.
  • Call for Holistic Measures: Experts advocate for additional support programs.
  • Evidence-Based: Recommendations are based on data from the Scientific Research and Data Centre (WODC).

Scientific and Statistical Support for the Bill

The call for reform is backed by solid research.

Multiple studies have demonstrated that young adults are more prone to engaging in risky gambling behaviors. According to recent research, approximately 18% of young adult gamblers show patterns that could lead to addiction. In contrast, the percentage among the general population is significantly lower.

This stark difference has spurred government action.

Key Findings

  • High-Risk Behavior: Nearly one in five young adults engage in dangerous gambling patterns.
  • Financial Vulnerability: Young players are more likely to face severe financial consequences.
  • Inadequate Current Measures: The existing framework under the Remote Gambling Act (KOA) does not fully protect this group.

Recommendations from the Scientific Community

The Scientific Research and Data Centre (WODC) has played a critical role in shaping the proposed reforms. Their analysis points to several shortcomings in current policies.

Key recommendations include:

  • Raising the minimum age for high-risk gambling.
  • Implementing strict financial controls such as deposit limits.
  • Expanding advertising restrictions to reduce exposure among vulnerable groups.

These recommendations have provided a data-backed foundation for the new bill23.

International Comparisons and Context

The Netherlands is not alone in its quest to reform gambling regulations.

Many countries have been grappling with similar challenges. For instance, nations with robust gambling industries have already implemented measures to protect young adults.

Some of these measures include raising the legal age, imposing strict advertising controls, and enforcing deposit limits.

Lessons from Other Jurisdictions

  • Australia: Has stringent regulations in place to prevent gambling-related harm among young adults.
  • United Kingdom: Uses a combination of advertising restrictions and deposit limits to protect vulnerable consumers.
  • Nordic Countries: Known for their strict regulatory frameworks that prioritize public health over market expansion.

These international examples underscore the growing consensus that proactive regulation is important. The Dutch government is drawing on this global experience to craft a policy that not only protects its citizens but also sets a precedent for other countries facing similar issues.

Challenges and Criticisms

While the proposed reforms have strong support among public health advocates, they are not without their challenges.

Risk of Driving Players Underground

One of the most significant concerns is that stricter regulations might push young players toward illegal gambling websites.

Michael Groothuizen, chairman of the KSA, warned that unregulated markets and offshore platforms may become a refuge for those who feel squeezed by tighter rules. If players move to these platforms, they could face even greater risks due to the lack of proper oversight.

  • Illegal Markets: Stricter regulations could inadvertently bolster unregulated sites.
  • Lack of Protection: Unlicensed operators do not follow the strict deposit or advertising controls.
  • Monitoring Needed: Authorities must closely track the market to mitigate these risks.

Impact on the Gambling Industry

Industry stakeholders are also worried about the potential economic impact.

The gambling sector is a significant source of revenue and employment. Tighter controls and a higher minimum age might lead to reduced participation in legal gambling activities.

This change could, in turn, affect the revenue streams of licensed operators.

  • Economic Concerns: Possible decline in legal gambling revenues.
  • Market Dynamics: Operators may need to adjust their business models to adapt.
  • Job Implications: Potential impact on employment within the sector.

Balancing Safety and Market Integrity

Critics argue that while the reform is well-intentioned, it might not be enough on its own.

Age restrictions are just one tool in the fight against gambling addiction. Comprehensive solutions must include education, counseling, and ongoing support for those at risk. This balanced approach would ensure that while the market is safeguarded, individual players receive the help they need.

  • Holistic Approach: Support systems should complement regulatory measures.
  • Education and Counseling: Critical for addressing the root causes of gambling addiction.
  • Long-Term Strategy: A multi-pronged approach is necessary to achieve lasting change.

Next Steps and Timeline

The proposed bill is on track for finalization by the end of 2025. A draft version is expected to be released in early 2026. The legislative process will involve consultations with various stakeholders, including industry experts, consumer advocates, and academic researchers.

Key Milestones

  • Draft Release: Early 2026 is earmarked for the publication of a draft bill.
  • Legislative Finalization: The final version of the bill should be ready by the end of 2025.
  • Implementation Phase: Once approved, operators will have a transition period to comply with the new regulations.

What to Watch

The coming months will be crucial. Lawmakers will debate the finer points of the bill, with a focus on how to balance consumer protection with the practicalities of market operation.

Stakeholders will be monitoring:

  • Enforcement Mechanisms: How the KSA will implement its new powers.
  • Market Reactions: The response from both legal operators and the underground gambling scene.
  • Public Feedback: Input from young adults and consumer advocacy groups on the effectiveness of the measures.

A Comprehensive Look at the Impact

This reform is not just a policy update – it is a transformative step. Its impact will be felt across multiple layers of society, including:

Social Impact

  • Protecting the Youth: Raising the legal age aims to reduce the risk of addiction among young adults.
  • Financial Stability: Stricter deposit limits can help prevent individuals from falling into debt.
  • Public Health: A decrease in gambling addiction rates could lead to lower social costs related to health and welfare services.

Economic Impact

  • Legal Market Adjustments: Operators will need to adapt their strategies to comply with new regulations.
  • Revenue Considerations: While there might be a short-term dip in revenues, the long-term goal is a more sustainable and safer market.
  • Employment: Changes in market dynamics may lead to shifts in job roles and responsibilities within the industry.

Regulatory Impact

  • Stronger Oversight: Enhanced powers for the KSA will help create a more transparent and accountable gambling environment.
  • Cross-Border Implications: With illegal markets being a concern, there may be increased collaboration with international regulators.
  • Precedent Setting: Success in the Netherlands could pave the way for similar reforms in other countries.

Balancing Objectivity and Reporting

In covering this story, it is essential to separate verified facts from opinions. The data and research supporting the reforms are clear. However, the future impact of these measures remains uncertain. Multiple perspectives are at play:

  • Government Officials emphasize the need for a safer gambling environment.
  • Industry Leaders are cautious about the unintended consequences on the legal market.
  • Academic Experts advocate for additional measures beyond age limits and financial controls.

This balanced view helps provide a clear picture of what the reforms aim to achieve and the challenges that lie ahead.

The Road Ahead for Dutch Gambling Policy

As the legislative process moves forward, all eyes will be on Amsterdam. The government’s decisive action reflects a broader shift in public policy. By integrating age restrictions, deposit limits, and advertising controls, Dutch authorities aim to create a framework that protects the public without stifling the industry entirely.

Key Considerations for the Future

  • Ongoing Monitoring: The success of these measures will depend on continuous monitoring and adjustments as needed.
  • Public Education: Informing young adults about the risks of gambling and available support services will be vital.
  • Stakeholder Engagement: Regular dialogue between regulators, industry operators, and public health experts will help address emerging issues.

Global Implications

The Netherlands’ approach could influence gambling policies worldwide. Countries facing similar challenges may look to this model as a blueprint for their own reforms. By demonstrating a clear commitment to public health and consumer protection, the Dutch government is setting an example that resonates far beyond its borders.

Wrapping Up

The proposed reform to raise the minimum age for high-risk gambling to 21 represents a significant shift in Dutch policy.

It is a bold, data-driven decision aimed at reducing gambling addiction harm among young adults. The comprehensive bill includes not only an increase in the legal age but also strict deposit limits, tighter advertising rules, and enhanced regulatory powers for the KSA.

This initiative reflects a broader commitment to safeguarding a vulnerable population. It also acknowledges the complex challenges that come with regulating an industry that is as dynamic as it is profitable. While the potential risks – such as a shift toward illegal gambling – cannot be ignored, the measures are designed with public safety in mind.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, its impact will be closely watched.

The outcome could reshape gambling regulation in the Netherlands and serve as a model for similar reforms worldwide. For now, the focus remains on protecting young people and ensuring that the excitement of gambling does not come at the cost of their financial and personal well-being.

On Business2Community, we also do our duty to protect players by providing accurate and fact-checked casino reviews.

Sources

The content on this site should not be considered gambling advice. Gambling involves financial risk, and you should never wager more than you can afford to lose. This site is not intended for use in jurisdictions where online gambling is prohibited and should only be accessed in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

Winnings are not guaranteed, and gambling outcomes are subject to chance. You may not be entitled to consumer protections or dispute resolution mechanisms in your country or state of residence, so please conduct your own due diligence.

This website is free for you to use, but we may receive a commission from the gambling operators featured on this site. Our rankings and reviews are independent and based on objective criteria, unaffected by any partnerships.

  

 

Privacy & Cookies policy | Editorial guidelines | © 2025 business2community.com