Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Flipboard 0 When he started investing, Chris Sacca told himself, “F*ck it… I’m just not going to play this traditionally anymore.” And as any Shark Tank fans out there know, Sacca is anything but traditional. From his cowboy shirt uniform to his self-described “colorful language,” the billionaire Lowercase Capital founder is constantly finding ways to shake up traditional conventions of a venture capitalist. Except one. Quirks aside, Sacca follows one of the oldest VC rules in the book: always have a process. Every investor has a set of questions they ask themselves and rules they follow when weighing an investment decision. For Peter Thiel, it’s the ability to get a monopoly. For Social Capital, it’s the ability to transform society. Chris Sacca’s rules are a bit more varied — but just as stringent. Following these rules has allowed Sacca to place hugely successful bets on early stage companies, on and off reality television. His impressive portfolio includes the likes of Uber, Slack, Stripe, and Twitter, and it’s all due to this process. Chris Sacca’s Shark Tank Success Investment Checklist After his many years of working in the tech world, Sacca has developed a formula for deciding whether to invest in a company: idea + hustle = success. The real talent, of course, is identifying the quality of the idea and hustle. His checklist rules, therefore, are all about identifying those elements and predicting what they’ll look like once they get a touch of that Sacca magic and that Shark Tank success. In his evaluation process, he asks himself the same series questions about potential ventures to look past the performance of the pitch and figure out whether this company is the next Slack or the next Clinkle. By always following the same checklist process, he makes sound investments that pay off big time. Here are the questions he asks. 1. Is this company already awesome? Everyone wants to bet early on a company that’s going to go big. With the increasing popularity of seed rounds and even pre-seed rounds, it can be easy to take a big bet on a company that’s so early-stage, they don’t even have a product. For Chris Sacca, that’s a huge red flag. He only invests in companies he thinks are already awesome, not ones he’s crossing his fingers he can make awesome. Chris Sacca invested in Slack. The product or concept has to be independently good already since no amount of investor magic is going to be able to turn a dud into a diamond. That’s why Chris prefers companies that already have: Happy users, preferably ones who refer the product to others A solid product, rather than a nebulous pre-product concept A capable team with a proven track record of collaborating productively An awesome company needs to have some proof that it’s awesome. Otherwise, it’s simply too much of a risk. If it has some of these elements, it can only improve with some funding. 2. Can I personally impact the outcome of this company? The relationship between VC and founder is the keystone of a successful venture, according to Sacca. His ideal relationship with companies isn’t about micromanaging or puppeteering, like some VCs. Instead, he prefers a “parenting model,” where his role is to get a company to grow up. This attitude is especially apparent in the way he’s talked about Twitter in recent years, likening the company to a misbehaving child. After being disappointed in Twitter’s performance, he says he’ll joke “That’s just my kid. I keep walking into their room and finding a big pile of drugs under the mattress. I’m like, ‘Come on! You could’ve been somebody.’” One of the real lessons here, he says, is to invest in something you have experience with. If you know absolutely nothing about the space and can’t make a meaningful contribution, it’s probably not worth your time. This is one of the major ways venture capital has changed, according to Lowercase capital’s creed: Much more vital in those inaugural days is collaborating side by side with a founding team that controls its own destiny. Entrepreneurs who are empowered by seasoned advisors, but free to frame achievement for themselves, are much happier. This inevitably shows in their products and the growth of their user bases and revenues. Having a lot of capital early on simply isn’t as important as having good advisors. And Sacca is one of the best. 3. Do I like these people? Since Sacca is going to spend a lot of time with the companies he invests in, he needs to know that time will be enjoyable. As his partner at Lowercase Matt Mazzeo says, investors and entrepreneurs really need to know who they’re getting into bed with before entering an agreement. Above all, they need to know if they’re going to like each other. As Mazzeo puts it, “I don’t think Chris is one of those guys who makes a ton of money and drops the mic and leaves the room. He loves the people in the room so much that he stays.” But that’s only because he invests in people who he really likes. If not, it’s just not worth the time. 4. Will this benefit from scale? Scale is Sacca’s favorite lever. As he said in a podcast with Tim Ferriss, investing is all about giving yourself “a chance to get rich”—and a lot of that has to do with benefiting from economies of scale. In fact, scale is the reason he has decided not to invest in certain companies, notoriously Airbnb. While the technology would work at scale, he worried that the dangers of operating it at scale would get in the way. However, his discretionary judgment worked in his favor when it came to Twitter. Other people dismissed Twitter as a toy, Sacca saw it as a tool that would be really easy to operate at scale. 5. Will I be proud of this deal? Sacca doesn’t get involved with shady companies. The real question here is whether he would be proud to tell his daughters he’s involved in a company in several years. If it smells fishy, it probably is, and it’s not worth touching. Here are some no-gos: No mistyped domains No automatic subscription renewals No products that prey on customers weaknesses Sacca invested in Uber as an angel investor way back in 2010. The real problem with investing in even one company like this, Sacca states, is that it drags your whole profile down. As an investor, you have a reputation to protect. Making a buck isn’t worth getting involved with something sleazy. 6. Does the founder believe in the company? Placing a bet on a founder is about taking a leap of faith. For Sacca, that means having faith in the company, but also the team behind the company. This is more than your basic personality match. It means the founder themselves believe that they’re going to succeed. Sacca looks for talent, but also confidence. One thing that turns Sacca off in the pitch is when the founder is trying to convince himself. Since he only works with founders who believe in the inevitability of their success, he has to ask, in their marrow, does the founder believe this product is going to succeed. Twitter Tweet Facebook Share Email This article originally appeared on Process Street and has been republished with permission.Find out how to syndicate your content with B2C Author: Kane Pepi <p>Kane Pepi is an experienced financial and cryptocurrency writer with over 2,000+ published articles, guides, and market insights in the public domain. Expert niche subjects include asset valuation and analysis, portfolio management, and the prevention of financial crime. Kane is particularly skilled in explaining complex financial topics in a user-friendlyView full profile ›More by this author:VoIP Basics: Everything Beginners Should Know!Bitcoin Investment, Trading & Mining: The Ultimate Guide for BeginnersIs This a Better Way to Set Your 2020 Goals and Resolutions?