How to Use Reliability Analysis to Know Your Data is Accurate

Reliability analysis is a powerful tool for assessing the consistency and accuracy of the data you are working with. It can give confirmation about the level of consistency of a production machine, company earnings, and sales figures. Making good use of this tool helps you identify production risks and opportunities before they arise.

At Business2Community, we’ve meticulously created this detailed guide to mastering reliability analysis. In this article, we’ll go through everything you need to know about this technique and how it helps you make smarter business decisions.

What is a Reliability Analysis?

Reliability analysis evaluates the reliability of scores obtained from different tests and measures to determine their consistency. You can also learn about the relationship between individual items you use in the calculation. A test reliability score helps you present your findings with greater confidence and higher accuracy.

In the statistics world, reliability refers to testing the reliability, with your result being a consistency coefficient. A well-constructed test should generate consistent results, regardless of the number of tests you conduct. If you repeat the same test and get similar measurements each time, the test results likely have good reliability, meaning you can trust the observations and conclusion.

The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, which spans from 0 to 1, is a popular way to denote the degree of reliability of your results.

When interpreting Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, 0.7 is a general rule of thumb for what to aim for. A coefficient alpha of 0.7 or higher indicates high reliability and a coefficient lower than 0.7 implies medium to poor reliability.

However, the 0.7 rule should only serve as a reference point. To assess the consistency of your data, you need to determine an appropriate break-off score based on your research purposes and data scale.

Who Needs to do a Reliability Analysis?

Reliability analysis is so much more than a research tool in academia. As a business professional, this method helps you craft more profitable strategies, gain a deeper understanding of your business structure, and identify key elements in the operations to improve user experience.

To give you an idea, here are some examples of how reliability analysis can be used in different roles:

• UX designers: Conducting reliability analysis enables UX designers to grasp consumer preferences more accurately. A customized purchase flow that’s based on research is likely to delight your clients and generate more sales.
• Business owners: As a business owner, you need to learn to interpret the reliability coefficient and test results to identify profitable investment options. Investment opportunities with a high reliability coefficient give investors and banks more confidence.
• Project managers: In project management, this technique spots poor test construction and any measurement error that may occur during the research process. For example, you can learn about the reliability and potential risks of using different machinery for a project.
• Policymakers: Policymakers rely on this method to study public behavior and measure the consistency of different social preferences. With this analysis, you can weigh the reliability of a social policy to make sure it aligns with public interests.

How to Perform a Reliability Analysis

Before we take a look at the process of performing this analysis, let’s talk about the different types of reliability analysis and their potential value to you, first.

Types of Reliability Analysis

There are 4 methods to measure reliability. Depending on your research goals and properties, you should select the appropriate method to harvest the most accurate results.

1. Test-retest reliability:

This statistical technique examines your testing process and allows you to spot administration problems during the experiment by repeating the process. To conduct this analysis, you need to perform the same test on the same group of people within a pre-designed time frame. Then, you calculate the correlation between the two tests with correlation analysis and assign a correlation coefficient to define the relationship between the two tests. A correlation coefficient of 0.8 or higher indicates good reliability in your results.

2. Internal consistency reliability:

This is used to measure the correlation among variables in the measurement scale to make sure they achieve the intended goals. Internal consistency reliability is widely used in the questionnaire design process. The split-half method is a common way to assess the reliability of your scores. Split the set of measurements into two halves and measure the correlation between the group results. If one-half of the components produce significantly different results than the other half, you need to revise the items in the test.

3. Parallel forms reliability:

This tool determines the standard error in your scale due to external factors. To use this technique, you must create two versions of the same test. Complete one version for the study group and gather the responses. Then, complete the alternate and equally difficult version for the same group of people after a period. Calculate the correlation between the measured responses to evaluate the outcome.

4. Inter-rater reliability:

This method breaks down the subjective interpretation involved in a study by having multiple qualified raters or judges rate the same measurement set and calculate the correlation. As people may interpret the same variable differently due to personal bias, this method helps measure the objectiveness of your findings.

Now that we have covered the 4 types, let’s dive into the step-by-step process of performing a reliability analysis.

Step 1: Choose a Study Objective & Type of Reliability Analysis

Decide on a study objective that’s relevant to the operation you want to complete. Common objectives span from controlling production quality in your factory to understanding consumer preferences for your product range. Once you know exactly what your objective is you can better determine what type of reliability analysis would be the best fit. You may want to choose multiple types if you want to be especially careful.

Step 2: Collect Your Data

Choose an appropriate measure scale that represents your target audience and run the test. Depending on your chosen method, you may need to gather repeated measurements/scores from the same population over time. Make absolutely sure that you collect valid, reliable data, or else your results won’t be accurate.

Step 3: Find the Reliability Coefficient

Now it’s time to get to the math. Organize the responses with a table and calculate the reliability score.

Here is the reliability coefficient formula that you will need:

If you’re studying a large number of responses, you may consider using statistical software like the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) developed by IBM. These software programs minimize human error and can calculate the scores efficiently to generate valid results.

Step 4: Draw a Conclusion and Share the Results

Based on your findings, draw a conclusion about the consistency of the measurement scale. If repeated measures produce the same results, your scale likely reflects reality and can be trusted.

Once you have determined reliability, you need to decide how to apply that to your business. This may be that you’re on the right track and you want to double down on your roadmap or that you need to change your strategy to improve your data reliability.

Examples of Reliability Analysis

Below, we provide a few examples of reliability analysis in the business context to demonstrate how to utilize this technique in your operation.

Example 1: Find Out the System Reliability

You are a production manager at a toy factory and you want to test the system reliability of a machine that’s vital to production. This machine has 3 components with failure rates of 15%, 30%, and 20% respectively.

When you plug these numbers into the reliability formula provided above, you can find out to which extent you can rely on this machine to deliver quality performance.

R = (1-0.15) x (1-0.30) x (1-0.20)

    = 0.476

The measured reliability coefficient is 0.476.

Assuming that the 0.7 rule applies, the test has found the machine to not be reliable. If you wish to change the scale of production efficiently, you’ll have to conduct a thorough investigation to find the underlying problems about why the machine is failing so often.

Example 2: Testing Your Team’s Reliability

You are the HR manager in a small business conducting an annual performance evaluation. You want to measure how reliably your team can do their job based on an aptitude test you’ve designed.

First, you need to distribute the test to your team and gather the scores:

Because reliability analysis measures failure, you need to take the percentage of questions your team got wrong to plug into the formula, like so:

R = (1-0.2) x (1-0.05) x (1-0.18) x (1-0.32) x (1-0.26)
    = 0.26

Since the coefficient is well below 0.7, you can conclude that your team doesn’t reliably have the knowledge to complete their work. From here, you can decide to offer more comprehensive training and upskilling, and run the test at a later date to see if the number can be increased.

How to Adjust a Reliability Analysis

When you conduct a reliability analysis, you may want to adjust the elements, measurement scales, and figures to better understand how different changes can affect the test results.

You can update the analysis by manipulating the components involved to study their characteristics. For example, you can replace a component in a machine to find out its effect on reliability or change the training modules you give to employees.

If updating a component generates more consistent results, it’s often a positive sign that you’re moving in the right direction. You can also observe the extent of the improvement to decide if implementing it throughout the production chain is cost-effective.

Sometimes, certain elements have to be consistently measured as they are time-sensitive. In such cases, you’ll also need to update the analysis and draw a new conclusion based on the new test results regularly.

Whenever you adjust the scale, you should follow the same steps as creating a new analysis and make sure you gather up-to-date information from reliable sources.

Limitations of Reliability Analysis

While this technique provides valuable insights into your system’s reliability, it has several drawbacks that can hinder your strategic development. You need to be aware of its limitations to obtain valid and useful test results.

It Doesn’t Explain the Interactions Among Factors

This technique can’t separate the relationships among variables. Without knowing how variables interact with each other, changing a component may lead to destructive consequences.

Incorporating other statistical tools like AVONA analysis and multiple regression analysis gives you a clearer idea about the standard deviation, standard error, total variance, and correlation among variables. Using these are a great way to enhance the validity of your test.

It Can’t Identify Changing Failure Rates Accurately

Sometimes, a component’s failure rates may be seasonal or situation-dependent, such as tires on a vehicle wearing faster in hotter weather. The analysis only considers consistent scores and fails to take into account fluctuating failure rates. Therefore, this tool is not a reliable measure to test systems with constantly changing failure rates, like when you have a high employee turnover.

It Doesn’t Offer Actionable Plans

Although Cronbach’s alpha coefficient quantifies how consistent the results are, the whole analysis doesn’t produce actionable improvement ideas. As the researcher, you need to conduct other tests like PEST analysis to map out possible solutions to address problems.

The Value of Reliability Analysis

Reliability analysis is a vital tool that businesses around the world rely on to assess the accuracy of their data. During the complex strategic planning process, this technique builds the foundation for further analyses by examining information reliability. You can gain better knowledge of your company structure and make informed business decisions with this method.

The reliability coefficient tells you about the potential risks involved in a production part. As a business professional, you can prepare for potential obstacles and identify solutions in time with this tool.

When you use this technique, you should be aware of its limitations. Every statistical tool has its advantages and disadvantages, therefore, you are always advised to incorporate other analytical tools introduced in the articles for the best results.

FAQs