Singapore Bans Cryptocurrency Gambling Citing Money Laundering Concerns
Gambling involves financial risk and may not be suitable for all individuals. Gambling industry experts create our content for informational purposes only. We may receive commissions from affiliate links at no cost to you, but our reviews remain independent and unbiased. We're committed to responsible gambling practices and transparent recommendations. About Us
Singapore has taken decisive action against cryptocurrency use in its gambling sector, implementing a comprehensive ban that prioritizes financial security over technological adoption. The move represents a significant policy stance in a country that has otherwise embraced fintech innovation.
Key Takeaways:
- Singapore prohibits all cryptocurrency use in casinos under Casino Control Act amendments
- Standard cashless gambling via regulated e-wallets remains permitted with transaction traceability
- Operators face fines up to SGD 10,000 and individuals up to six months’ imprisonment
- Crypto prediction platform Polymarket blocked nationwide in January 2025
- Marina Bay Sands and Resorts World Sentosa invested SGD 150 million in compliant cashless systems
- Crypto gambling revenue in Singapore plummeted 63% following implementation
Singapore has implemented a comprehensive ban on cryptocurrency use in gambling activities, amending its Casino Control Act to explicitly prohibit digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum in all gambling transactions. The measures, which took effect last month, represent a clear policy choice prioritizing financial integrity and anti-money laundering efforts over cryptocurrency adoption in the gambling sector.
Strategic Distinction: Crypto vs. Cashless
The regulatory changes draw a sharp distinction between cryptocurrency and conventional cashless payment systems. While Singapore has prohibited cryptocurrency transactions in casinos, standard cashless gambling via authorized e-wallets and virtual credits remains permitted and even encouraged by authorities.
Minister of State Sun Xueling emphasized this differentiation during parliamentary discussions on the amendments: “Our approach recognizes the benefits of traceable digital transactions while addressing the specific risks posed by cryptocurrency in gambling contexts. Cryptocurrencies present unique money laundering risks that cannot be adequately mitigated within the casino environment. We will not allow them in casinos.”
The Gambling Regulatory Authority (GRA), which oversees Singapore’s gambling industry, pointed to reports from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime linking crypto gambling operations to organized criminal networks as a key factor in the decision. Officials cited specific concerns about the pseudonymous nature of many cryptocurrencies and the challenges they present for customer due diligence and transaction monitoring.
Under the new regulations, all cashless gambling transactions must maintain complete traceability, with clear links to verified identities and traditional banking infrastructure. The requirements effectively rule out most cryptocurrency transactions while supporting conventional digital payment systems that maintain audit trails acceptable to Singaporean authorities.
Enforcement and Penalties
The legislative framework establishes significant consequences for violations, with operators facing fines of up to SGD 10,000 for accepting or facilitating cryptocurrency gambling. Individual participants can face penalties including imprisonment for up to six months for attempting to use digital currencies in gambling activities.
Singapore’s approach extends beyond traditional casinos to online platforms. In January 2025, authorities blocked access to Polymarket, a cryptocurrency-based prediction market platform, citing violations of the Gambling Control Act 2022. The move demonstrated Singapore’s willingness to extend its prohibition to emerging forms of crypto gambling, including prediction markets and betting exchanges that operate on blockchain technology.
“The Polymarket enforcement action sends a clear message about our comprehensive approach to cryptocurrency gambling,” explained Thomas Chen, head of digital enforcement at the GRA. “Whether it’s a traditional casino attempting to accept Bitcoin or a decentralized prediction platform operating on smart contracts, our regulations apply consistently.”
The technical implementation of these restrictions has involved coordination between regulatory authorities, internet service providers, and financial institutions. Singapore’s sophisticated digital infrastructure has enabled relatively effective enforcement, though officials acknowledge that determined individuals may attempt to circumvent restrictions through virtual private networks or other technical means.
Regional and Global Context
Singapore’s prohibition aligns with similar measures implemented by other jurisdictions, including Australia’s 2024 ban on cryptocurrency payments for online betting. The parallel moves suggest an emerging regulatory consensus on cryptocurrency gambling risks among countries with developed gambling oversight frameworks.
However, Singapore’s approach distinguishes itself through its comprehensive nature. While some jurisdictions have focused primarily on online gambling platforms, Singapore has explicitly prohibited cryptocurrency use across all gambling sectors, including its prominent integrated resort casinos.
The city-state’s prohibition comes amid broader regional concerns about cryptocurrency-facilitated money laundering. In neighboring Thailand, authorities have proposed similar restrictions on crypto prediction markets, citing financial crime risks.
Globally, regulatory approaches to cryptocurrency gambling remain fragmented. While Singapore and Australia have implemented prohibitions, other jurisdictions have taken more permissive approaches, with some Caribbean and European regulators developing licensing frameworks specifically for crypto gambling operations.
Industry Response and Adaptation
Singapore’s two integrated resort casinos, Marina Bay Sands and Resorts World Sentosa, have moved swiftly to comply with the regulations, investing approximately SGD 150 million collectively in enhanced cashless systems that meet the government’s traceability requirements.
These investments include upgraded payment infrastructure, enhanced customer verification protocols, and integration with Singapore’s national digital identity system. Both operators have publicly supported the government’s emphasis on financial integrity, though industry sources suggest the transition has not been without operational challenges.
“The integrated resorts recognize the importance of maintaining Singapore’s reputation for regulatory excellence,” noted casino industry analyst Michelle Lim. “While the compliance costs are substantial, they see long-term benefits in a gambling environment with strong financial crime protections.”
The prohibition has had a measurable impact on Singapore’s crypto gambling market. According to blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, cryptocurrency gambling revenue linked to Singapore-based users has declined by approximately 63% since the ban’s implementation, with roughly SGD 37 million in transactions blocked or diverted to other jurisdictions.
Despite this decline, authorities remain vigilant about evasion attempts. The GRA has reported detecting efforts to circumvent the ban through virtual private networks and foreign payment processors, prompting enhanced monitoring and enforcement actions.
Impact on Singapore’s Crypto Ecosystem
Singapore’s targeted approach to cryptocurrency gambling stands in contrast to its generally supportive stance toward blockchain technology and regulated digital asset activities. The city-state remains a hub for cryptocurrency businesses and continues to develop its regulatory framework for digital assets through the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).
“This is a nuanced policy decision focused specifically on gambling risks, not a broader rejection of cryptocurrency,” explained Dr. Wei Lin, fintech researcher at the National University of Singapore. “Singapore continues to pursue a balanced approach that encourages responsible innovation while addressing sector-specific risks.”
The differentiated approach has drawn mixed reactions from Singapore’s cryptocurrency community. Some industry participants have criticized the gambling prohibition as overly restrictive, arguing that properly regulated crypto gambling could provide adequate transparency and consumer protections.
Others have framed the targeted prohibition as a reasonable compromise that allows Singapore’s broader digital asset ecosystem to develop while addressing legitimate concerns in the gambling sector, which has historically faced elevated financial crime risks.
“From a policy perspective, this approach makes sense given Singapore’s unique position,” observed cryptocurrency compliance consultant Sophia Tan. “The government is demonstrating that it can support fintech innovation broadly while implementing targeted restrictions in higher-risk activities like gambling.”
As Singapore’s prohibition approaches its first anniversary, authorities point to early indicators of success, including reduced anonymous gambling activity and enhanced traceability in casino transactions. The GRA plans a comprehensive review of the measures’ effectiveness in late 2025, which may inform potential adjustments to the regulatory framework.
For now, Singapore’s prohibition represents one of the most definitive policy stances globally on the intersection of cryptocurrency and gambling, establishing a clear regulatory boundary that prioritizes financial integrity over the adoption of digital assets in a sector traditionally vulnerable to financial crime risks.
