Marketing your business in 2017 requires paying careful attention to which strategies are working and which aren’t. With the rapid proliferation of new marketing software and technology, cookie cutter marketing plans of yesteryear are simply not adequate.
A major reason for this is how drastically the customer journey has changed. Before the internet, customer journeys were fairly straightforward. Advertising occurred on radio, television, and in print – and not much else. Now, customers are engaging with brands, searching for information, and making purchases on countless devices.
Unfortunately, knowing that doesn’t make successful marketing any easier to achieve. If anything, it makes it much harder. When deciding which campaigns and platforms to continue using and which ones to ditch, it’s important to have a detailed understanding of what they are bringing to the table.
One of the more popular ways to parse out those details is by using multi-touch attribution. Multi-touch attribution is the process of assigning value to respective customer touch points that have occurred leading up to a conversion. In other words, it’s a way of weighting the various instances of contact with the lead. That value is measured in revenue credit percentage, the portion of total revenue that can be attributed to each respective marketing strategy along the way.
This way, you can see over time which types of contact are contributing most consistently and rewardingly. Let’s take a look at some of the more common attribution models and see how they tick.
For many businesses, single-touch attribution is the default mode of operations. Under this model, credit is given only to the first or last instance of contact before conversion. There is a familiar logic at play here: if this is the touch that most immediately preceded the conversion, it’s natural to assume there is some causation between the two. Conversely, if a particular campaign led to the lead in the first place, it deserves more credit than any others.
This model can work, but it can also leave your business open to some misleading information on ROI and revenue attribution. Many times, a customer’s path to converting involves many stops along the way. While the last one does contain inherent value (at the very least, it confirmed the positive feelings this person was already developing about your business), but giving all the revenue credit to one event ignores everything that happened before or after.
For example, if you tend to execute a certain kind of campaign – ebook promotion, for instance – for leads and opportunities who are in the middle of the buyer’s journey, a single-touch attribution model would consistently neglect the revenue-driving tole those campaigns play.
The time-decay model is the multi-touch most closely related to last-touch attribution. With time-decay, the business gives increasing revenue credit as the interactions get closer to conversion. This applies the basic principle of single-touch – that the later the interaction is, the more credit it deserves – but spreads it out to include some revenue credit for earlier interactions as well.
Detractors of this model would argue it overlooks the early interactions which created the leads in the first place. However, as respected Google employee and digital marketing evangelist Avinash Kaushik puts it, “If early touchpoints were so magnificent, why didn’t they convert?”
That might seem a bit harsh – after all, some early interactions simply aren’t meant to close yet – but if you notice you have certain campaigns that consistently lead to conversions at the bottom of the sales funnel, this model may work best for you.
The linear model gives equal revenue credit to every touchpoint a lead makes along the path to conversion. This is often a good step to take if a company is making its first foray into multi-touch attribution. It offers simplicity and clean reporting that can be extremely attractive for business owners with limited time and resources to devote to ROI tracking.
One shortcoming for the linear model is it doesn’t offer much room for growth-based modelling. When you apply credit evenly throughout all possible touchpoints, you limit how much insight can be gleaned. If leads aren’t converting at a satisfactory rate, you know something needs to be changed; it just won’t be quite clear what.
The position-based attribution model (also known as U-shaped) gives increased weight to both the first and last interactions a lead has before converting. This model takes the philosophy of the time-decay model – that the last touch has an important impact on conversion – and includes some room for credit for the first interaction as well.
You might call this the “baseball model” because in baseball, starting pitchers and closers are typically given the most credit for a victory, while middle relievers are given less. It’s a logical solution to the problem of picking between first and last touches. By opting for a happy medium between the two, you avoid wasting time on middle touchpoints while leaving room to gain insights from both first and last.
Interaction-based modelling is a way of using historical business data to anchor your revenue attribution. With it, the marketer ascribes revenue credit based on the specific type of interaction. If, throughout your time tracking ROI for your business, a particular video, webinar, ebook, etc. has the most value of any individual piece of content, then you assign it a heavier weight than other customer touch points along the buyer’s journey.
As you might expect, this is typically a good option for marketers who’ve already been tracking these metrics for years. It requires an intimate understanding of how different campaign formats have worked in more isolated circumstances.
However, this model can be susceptible to confirmation bias because it requires you to insert initial assumptions into the data framework. Therefore, it’s only recommended if you have an “outlier” piece of content that has driven traffic in enough past campaigns that you can be confident in its continued success.
If you already use sales and/or marketing software like Salesforce, HubSpot, or Brightfunnel, there is likely already a significant trove of data from which to learn. Of course, that dataset can be daunting and unhelpful if it is not organized into actionable strategies. Multi-touch attribution strategies are growing in popularity as solutions for that very problem.
Regardless of which model you choose – the linear model is a good place to start for beginners – giving multi-touch a chance can lead to a far better understanding of where your leads are coming from and what conversion strategies are most consistently successful.
Comments on this article are closed.