3 Types of Links That Google Doesn’t Like: Is Your Site Being Penalized Because of This?

Ever since Google did its Penguin 2.0 update back on May 22nd (2013), many sites have been scrambling to recover. In my opinion, this was one of the most significant algorithm changes to come down the pike in years because it changed some long-standing rules of SEO. And, one of those is linking practices.

How Backlinks Worked in the Past to Drive Traffic

Before Penguin 2.0, one of the “truisms” of search engine optimization writing was to make keywords your anchor text. When Penguin 2.0 hit, it did away with this SEO writing guideline to a large degree.

Now, we’re expected to vary anchor text, not use exact match anchor text and insert branded anchor text. And overusing a few keywords on your site can be seen as spam by Google.

Aaaarrrgggghhhhh! Enough to make you tear your hair out, right?

Just when you think you’ve gotten in a groove and can settle in to produce content that drives traffic, the rules change. As an SEO writer, let me tell ya, one thing to get used to with Google is that change is the only constant. So keep this front and center at all times in your online marketing efforts.

Recommended for YouWebcast: The Art of Community Development: Turning Brand Awareness Into Sales

Speaking of change and links, following are three types of links Google doesn’t like.

Linkbuildilng No No's

Are You Using Any of These Linkbuilding Tactics? If So, Be Careful

1. Links from Press Releases: This change came after Penguin 2.0. Following is what Google thinks of these now – and why.

According to Google, press release distribution for SEO benefit is just another source of paid links. You pay for the distribution service, and the result is (was) SEO benefit. In fact, PR companies openly listed SEO among the benefits of using their service. As with other forms of paid linking, Google is devaluing these links now. [Source: SEO: Google Devalues another Link-building Tactic]

2. Backlinks from Sites You Control: If you have multiple sites and cross-link between them, you might be doing yourself a disservice.

For example, I have a main site on freelance writing (InkwellEditorial) where I discuss “all things freelance writing. Then, I have a sub-site of this site, where I just discuss SEO writing (SeoWritingJobs). Obviously, I cross-link a lot between these two. Makes sense, no?

Well, now apparently, I could be doing myself more harm than good. Following is what Google could think of this practice now.

Google search becoming more sophisticated with its calculations in recent years has greatly impacted how it uses backlinks as one of a couple hundred factors taken into account in determining search rankings. The result has been a seismic shift for many site owners and SEO consultants in how they approach link building. Those who made use of what Google search labels “link schemes,” have suddenly found themselves with a whole host of backlinks that are attracting penalties and raising havoc with their site rankings. [Source: Manage Link Risk to Help Recover Search Rankings]

In my opinion, this is one of the reasons Google pushes so hard to get people to set up Google+ Author accounts. It makes it easier to track your web properties. Now, I don’t think this was an overriding reason – but it certainly doesn’t hurt them in their efforts to keep track of you online, now does it?

3. Backlinks from Blog Comments and Forum Discussion Boards: Apparently, Google can view this as some type of link schemes, as referenced in the Search Engine Journal post linked to just above.

What to Do So You Don’t Have to Worry about Google’s Constantly Changing Rules

While “The Big G” does get a bad rap sometimes for its ever-changing algorithms, I tend to believe it’s for the greater good. After all, their business is built on returning relevant, informative content for web surfers. These changes – while cumbersome for us as webmasters – are meant to try to stay one step ahead of the spammers, schemers and scammers.

So if you produce great content and build a fervent, active community around it (social media, newsletters, constant blogging, YouTube videos, etc.), you won’t have to worry — so much — about what Google is doing.

Comments: 7

  • Mike says:

    Great article but I still be believe Google’s approach is very flawed. When they say relevant search, sometimes the people they punish are the ones truly relevant so they do their searches a disservice by putting mediocre results ahead of more relevant results just because they are mad a company might have syndicated their articles across the web. For instants – people may want to start a certain type of business. Punished company A who was number one may have a truly detailed plan to really help people but now a person who has no industry experience now ranks ahead and all they talk about is generalizations with no real solutions. The users of Google suffer. Google results are terrible right now period. People like the theory of what their algorithms are supposed to do but in reality the quality they seek is more elusive now then ever.

    • Mike,

      Sooner or later, everyone disagrees with “The Big G”, as I call them, in some way.

      But, as mere peons playing in their sandbox, all most of us can do is try to remain in compliance with their ever-changing rules — and work our tails off to build our on communities so we’re not affected by their every move.

      Thanks for taking the time to chime in.

  • Evan says:

    this blog on why your site might be penalized by google was informative

  • Thanks for this article… I still think press releases are helpful from an overall marketing standpoint and I won’t quit utilizing them ever in our marketing campaigns..whether or not Google places high value on PR links is debatable as I still find them helpful. I think as long as you aren’t looking spammy and trying to manipulate Google, any unique content creation is helpful. Just my opinion.

  • I agree Mandy, and like you, I still use press releases as part of my online marketing strategy.

    I find that the more changes Google makes, the more I work to build my own community around my content (as I said to Mike above). This way, I worry less about what might be coming down the pike from them next.

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

  • Mandy, I agree with you. I still use press releases as part of my online marketing strategy. And I have no intention of stopping.

    I also work to build a community around my content online — that way I don’t have to worry so much about what Google is doing.

    Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts. :-)

Add a New Comment

Thank you for adding to the conversation!

Our comments are moderated. Your comment may not appear immediately.