Why engagement and entertainment aren’t mutually exclusive in online advertising.
I was flicking through my Flipboard the other day and came across the following headline ‘Memo to Online Ads: Nix the engagement and focus on entertainment’.
Naturally I found this interesting – after all, ‘engaging with customers’ is pretty much the marketing holy grail: Stop with your one-way, shouty advertising and start having conversation with your consumers. Move away from the frequency and consistency model of marketing and start thinking about transmedia storytelling. Whichever way you slice and dice it, most modern marketers will tell you it’s all about engagement.
So an article headline telling me to stop engaging and start entertaining certainly grabbed my attention.
To be fair to Erika Morphy, the contributor, the headline made it clear that the article was about online ads, rather than marketing in general – but still. I wanted to read more.
Related Resources from B2C
» Free Webcast: Build Better Products by Identifying and Validating Your Riskiest Assumptions
Erika’s central point was that online ads which concentrate on moving the consumer from device to device (or touchpoint to touchpoint) – eg from the smartphone on their way to work to their desktop/laptop at the office – don’t work, and that instead we should use online ads to entertain. She went on to cite the latest Old Spice YouTube piece starring Terry Crews and his musical muscles as a prime example of ‘entertaining’ content. She tells us that this ‘online ad’ is ‘entertaining’ rather than ‘engaging’.
I got really confused by this. Yes, the video is engaging. No, it isn’t an ‘online ad’ (that would be a banner or skyscraper). Yes, we should try to entertain people online. No, that doesn’t mean we stop engaging with them (the Old Spice video is on YouTube, where viewers can comment on it. It’s a casebook example of engaging with an audience). Yes, of course we should try to move people from touchpoint to touchpoint. No, that doesn’t preclude using entertaining content to do so (as I said in my post on customer touchpoints, an entertaining TV spot can easily move you to some more entertaining or informative content online, which can push you to a Facebook page or an e-commerce site, or a data-collection mechanic).
The article is really strange and misses the point of online marketing, which seeks to engage, enthuse and entertain an audience and use multiple devices and platforms to do so. My desire here is not to disparage the Forbes article, but to try to clarify that engagement and entertainment are not mutually exclusive – and indeed are a central part of a multi-channel marketing strategy, as practiced by most successful brands. A case in point would be Coca-Cola, who’s Vice-President, Global Advertising Strategy and Creative Excellence, Jonathan Mildenhall, explains this much better than I do in the Content 2020 video on YouTube. And if it’s good enough for Coca-Cola, it’s good enough for me!